382
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

An electrophysiological index of outcome evaluation that may influence subsequent cooperation and aggression strategies

ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon &
Pages 420-433 | Received 18 Dec 2017, Published online: 23 Jul 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Human social decision-making is significantly modulated by previous decision outcomes. Using event-related potentials (ERPs), we examined whether ERP components evoked by outcome feedback could serve as electrophysiological indices to examine the influence of current outcome evaluation on subsequent cooperative or aggressive decision-making. Thirty-four adult volunteers participated in a social game task, in which they were asked to choose between cooperation and aggression with an opponent player.Conventionally-averaged ERPs and temporospatial principal components analysis (PCA) factors were tested for their associations with subsequent decision-making. Results revealed that a central-parietal late positive potential (LPP) and central-parietal PCA factor approximating the classic LPP were related to changes of decision-making strategies on subsequent trials; however, the effect was significant only when the opponent selected ‘cooperate’ in the initial trial. The decision to cooperate in subsequent trials induced a larger LPP relative to the decision to aggress following opponent cooperation in the initial trial. Furthermore, we found that larger LPP amplitudes for an opponent’s cooperative decision on the initial trial were associated with a higher probability of choosing cooperation on the subsequent trial.

The results suggest that the amplitude of the central-parietal LPP is an electrophysiological index of the influence of initial outcome on subsequent social decision-making.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31600914), and the Youth Foundation of the Ministry of education of Humanities and Social Science project (15YJC190026).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the the National Natural Science Foundation of China [31600914]; the Youth Foundation of the Ministry of education of Humanities and Social Science project [15YJC190026];

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.