370
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Management of high-risk Myeloma: an evidence-based review of treatment strategies

, , &
Pages 753-765 | Received 16 May 2016, Accepted 20 Jun 2016, Published online: 04 Jul 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Despite the progress made in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma over recent decades, a significant cohort with high-risk disease as defined by specific clinical and genetic criteria continue to respond poorly to standard treatment. These patients represent a particular challenge to the treating physician and require early identification as well as personalized treatment strategies.

Areas covered: In this review, we discuss the prognostic impact of adverse clinical, radiological and genetic factors, evaluate available scoring systems and highlight key aspects of the therapeutic management of high-risk myeloma. MEDLINE and recent scientific meetings’ databases were searched for the keywords ‘high-risk’ and ‘multiple myeloma’ and relevant studies relating to both diagnostic and therapeutic approaches were identified.

Expert commentary: A case is made for intensive induction using combinations of novel agents, early high-dose therapy supported by autologous stem cell transplantation and the widespread use of maintenance therapies. Novel therapeutic options, especially in the field of immunotherapy, are currently explored in clinical trials and have the potential to further improve outcomes for patients with high-risk multiple myeloma.

Declaration of interest

H Goldschmidt discloses honoraria and research funding from the following; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.