2,572
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Meta-analysis

Factors associated with blood pressure variation in sickle cell disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analyses

, , , , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 359-368 | Received 09 Jun 2021, Accepted 15 Feb 2022, Published online: 28 Feb 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Objectives

Blood pressure (BP) values ≥120/70 mmHg considerably increase the risk of pulmonary hypertension and renal dysfunction in Sickle Cell Disease (CSD) patients and ultimately increased morbidity and mortality. This has led to the development of the term relative systemic hypertension (RSH). RSH was defined as Systolic BP 120–139 mm Hg or diastolic BP 70–89 mm Hg, whereas systemic hypertension is defined as Systolic BP ≥ 140 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mm Hg. Systematic identification of BP variations and risk factors in SCD patients could promote effective management. This review aimed to identify factors associated with BP variation among SCD patients.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to December 2020 with no geographical or language restrictions. Two reviewers independently screened and summarized data from eligible studies.

Results

Advancing age, gender, higher body weight, hemoglobin, eGFR, triglycerides, greater hematocrit, higher blood viscosity, history of blood transfusion, and targeted variants in DRD2 and MIR4301 genes were independently associated with the risk of hypertension in SCD patients.

Conclusion

Interventions that consider these risk factors may potentially contribute to lower BP pressure in SCD patients and prevent the development of severe complications.

Acknowledgments

Gill Morgan, Health Science Library, University of Cape Town, who assisted with developing the search strategy.

Disclosure

The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers in this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (Award Numbers U24HL135600 and 1U24HL135881).