130
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Outcomes of treatment with sorafenib in Egyptian patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

, ORCID Icon, , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 99-107 | Received 17 Sep 2017, Accepted 08 Nov 2017, Published online: 20 Nov 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Sorafenib is the standard of care, first line treatment for advanced HCC. This study aims to evaluate real-life efficacy and safety of sorafenib in Egyptian patients with Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the medical oncology department at Maadi Armed Forces Medical Compound. Patients with advanced HCC who received sorafenib between January and December 2015 were included (130 patients).

Results: The median overall survival of patients with HCC treated with sorafenib was 5 months (CI: 4.166–5.834), and progression free survival was 4 months (CI: 3.479–4.521). Disease control rate was 45.44% with 2 patients experiencing complete remission (1.2%). The adverse events rate was 76.1% for toxicities of all grades; with hand and foot syndrome being the most common (32.3% of any grade) and liver dysfunction the most common grade III toxicity (13.8%). Treatment was stopped for radiological progression based on modified RECIST criteria in 47 patients (36.3%), 18 patients stopped the treatment for intolerable toxicity. At the end of treatment upon radiological progression, 51 patients (39.2%) were still classified as Child A class of cirrhosis.

Conclusion: Sorafenib use should be limited to patients with Child A, PS 0–1, and low disease burden.

Author contributions

Yousery Nada, Noha Rashad, Omar Abdel Rahman were involved in the design of the study and writing the manuscript. Mai Eissa,Aya Ghonaim, Kyrillus Farag, Islam Saadawi, Ahmed Sheha, Mahmoud El gewaity contributed to the data collection and data entry.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties. Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.