584
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Pancreatic reconstruction techniques after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a review of the literature

ORCID Icon, , , , , , & show all
Pages 797-806 | Received 19 Apr 2019, Accepted 03 Jul 2019, Published online: 12 Jul 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Postoperative pancreatic fistula is the most troublesome complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy, and is an on-going area of concern for pancreatic surgeons. The specific pancreatic reconstruction technique is an important factor influencing the development of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Areas covered: In this paper, we briefly introduced the definition and relevant influencing factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula. We performed a search of all meta-analyses published in the last 5 years and all published randomized controlled trials comparing different pancreatic anastomotic techniques, and we evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of different techniques.

Expert opinion: No individual anastomotic method can completely avoid postoperative pancreatic fistula. Selecting specific techniques tailored to the patient’s situation intraoperatively may be key to reducing the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Article highlights

  • The risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula are multiple and complex, and include patient-related factors, pancreatic factors, surgical factors and perioperative management factors.

  • The incidence rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula after invagination pancreaticojejunostomy is similar to that after duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy. The two methods have their own advantages and disadvantages.

  • Pancreaticogastrostomy is another safe pancreatic anastomotic method with an incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula similar to that after pancreaticojejunostomy.

  • External pancreatic duct stents may reduce the rate and severity of postoperative pancreatic fistula in the setting of high-risk pancreatic anastomosis.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jane Charbonneau, DVM and Angela Morben, DVM, from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Group China (www.liwenbianji.cn/ac), for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the grant of the Second Hospital of Jilin University.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.