1,210
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

Person transfer assist systems: a literature review

, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 270-279 | Received 16 Apr 2019, Accepted 25 Sep 2019, Published online: 12 Oct 2019
 

Abstract

Objective

Novel developments in the robotics field have produced systems that can support person wheelchair transfers, maximize safety and reduce caregiver burden. The purpose of this study was to identify and describe these systems, their usability (or satisfaction), the context for which they have been or can be used and how they have been evaluated to determine evidence for their effectiveness.

Method

Available research on Person Transfer Assist Systems (PTAS) was systematically gathered using similar standards to the PRISMA guidelines. The search terms were derived from common terms and via exploring similar review articles. Initial search terms displayed 1330 articles and by using the inclusion/exclusion criteria 96 articles were selected for abstract review. After full- text reviewing 48 articles were included.

Results

29 articles concerned research in robotic transfer systems, 10 articles used both ceiling and floor-mounted lifts and 9 articles used only floor-mounted lifts as an intervention/control group. The results of this analysis identified a few usability evaluations for robotic transfer prototypes, especially ones comparing prototypes to existing marketed devices.

Conclusion

Robotic device research is a recent development within assistive technology. Whilst usability evaluations provided evidence that a robotic device will provide better service to the user, the sample number of subjects used are minimal in comparison to any of the intervention/control group articles. Experimental studies between PTASs are required to support technological advancements. Caregiver injury risk has been the focus for most of the comparison articles; however, few articles focus on the implications to the person.

    IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION

  • Ceiling mounted lifts are preferred over floor-based lifts due to lower injury rates.

  • Many robotic transfer systems have been developed; however, there is a paucity of quantitative and qualitative studies.

  • Based on the results of this review, rehabilitation settings are recommended to use ceiling over floor assist systems, and it is recommended to provide training on using devices to assist with patient transfers to lower the risk of injuries.

Acknowledgements

The contents of this paper do not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.

Disclosure statement

Dr. Cooper is one of the co-inventors of StrongArm and AgileLife NextHealth bed robotic systems mentioned in this literature review. The other authors hold no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

Sivashankar Sivakanthan was funded by the Craig H. Nielsen Spinal Foundation and the Paralyzed Veterans of America. Eline Blaauw was funded by the Paralyzed Veterans of America. Mark Greenhalgh is sponsored by the National Science Foundation Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship [Grant number: DGE-1144584]. Dr. Cooper was funded by a US Department of Veterans Affairs Senior Research Career Scientist Award [Grant number: B9269-L].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.