45
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

The influence of existing tunnel shape and pillar distance on cross tunnel interaction

, &
Pages 519-531 | Received 02 Dec 2022, Accepted 16 Nov 2023, Published online: 06 Dec 2023
 

ABSTRACT

Underground transportation systems often involve multiple tunnels constructed closely together. Previous studies mainly focus on interaction between circular tunnels; by contrast, interaction mechanisms involving non-circular tunnels are not well understood. In this study, four physical three-dimensional centrifuge tests were performed in dry sand, simulating the response of existing circular and horseshoe-shaped tunnels to a newly excavated tunnel. Two different ratios between pillar depth and tunnel diameter (P/D) of 0.5 and 2.0 were considered. Furthermore, three-dimensional numerical back-analyses considering small-strain stiffness were undertaken. Results reveal that the ground settlement above an existing horseshoe-shaped tunnel is less sensitive to pillar depth than for circular ones. Furthermore, for P/D = 0.5, the existing horseshoe-shaped tunnel experiences both vertical and horizontal compression; more stress reduction occurs vertically than horizontally. A circular tunnel for the same pillar depth becomes compressed vertically but elongated horizontally; stress reduction around the existing circular tunnel is less vertically than horizontally. However, for P/D = 2.0, both types of tunnel become elongated vertically and compressed horizontally because of a larger reduction in vertical stresses than horizontal ones. These results demonstrate that both pillar depth and shape profoundly affect tunnel deformation mechanisms.

Acknowledgments

The research described in this paper was financially supported by the Research Grants Council of the HKSAR (General Research Fund Project No. 16208115 and 16207414).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee [No. 16208115 and 16207414].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.