https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3020-1869
![Sample our Area Studies journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5922/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Area-Studies.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Several studies have pointed out that institutional layering of formal social programmes over informal welfare arrangements in Indonesia has undermined the social solidarity between welfare actors. The means-tested Housing Renovation Programme in Kulon Progo Regency was studied by drawing on primary and secondary data, including 11 in-depth interviews with key stakeholders. This article has, consequently, a different argument. The layered approach has stimulated the development of solidarity ventures by welfare actors in providing decent housing for the needy. This could have occurred because of the government adopting a community-based distribution system, rather than a statistical calculation-based system.
Acknowledgments
This article is supported by ‘Hibah Riset FISIPOL Universitas Gadjah Mada’ (2016) scholarship to the author. Last but not least, I would like to express my gratitude to reviewers and editors for their review.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Notes
1. Taken within 8 days living in the Giripeni village, Kulon Progo Regency.
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Tauchid Komara Yuda
Tauchid Komara Yuda is a former junior research assistant in the Department of Social Development and Welfare, Universitas Gadjah Mada. Currently, he pursuing the master degree in Department of Development Policy, Korean Development Institute School of Public Policy and Management, South Korea. His study focuses primarily on social policy, with particular emphasis on comparative welfare regime, citizenship, welfare politics and care policy. Find the author’s academic page at the following link: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57201631933
