Abstract
Women have supported, willingly or not, the Sudan People's Liberation Army's (SPLA) struggle of 22 years that led to the country's independence in 2011 as part of the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement. This article explains the movement's relationship to women by contrasting it with other examples of guerilla armies in sub-Saharan Africa at the time. It highlights the lack of ideological depth of the movement from its inception, and dissects the many roots behind the rank-and-file and the population's hostility toward women's fighting. It analyzes the reasons behind the creation of the only “Girls' battalion”, Ketiba Banat, which became an incubator for the creation of a new female elite and fulfilled political and social functions during the 22 years struggle. It also depicts other groups of women who joined the SPLA and were militarily trained outside of Ketiba Banat. Women's engagement was socially stratified during the war and membership to Ketiba Banat became an engine for increased social differentiation during the war and even more so afterwards. The women who were trained in other battalions but found themselves excluded from post-war neo-patrimonial networks, share the same frustrations than in other African post-conflict contexts.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Notes
1. Weber, “Barbarian Beasts,” “Women Without Arms.”
2. Stone, “We Were All Soldiers.”
3. Jok, “Militarism, Gender and Reproductive Suffering”; Jok, “Militarization and Gender Violence”; Beswick, “Women, War and Leadership”; Duany and Duany, “War and Women in the Sudan”; Faria, “Gendering War and Peace in South Sudan.”
4. Rolandsen, Guerrilla Government, 143.
5. A rare exception has been Jok when he mentionned in his doctoral thesis the little sympathy at the local level that Western Dinka women felt towards the elitist women's associations during the war.
6. Utas, “West-African Warscapes.”
7. Urdang, “Women in National Liberation Movements,” 214.
8. Johnson, The Root Causes, 59–63.
9. Johnson, “Twentieth-Century Civil Wars,” 127.
10. Johnson, The Root Causes, 63.
11. Nyaba, Politics of Liberation, 30.
12. Johnson, “The Sudan People's Liberation Army,” 53–4.
13. Nyaba, Politics of Liberation in South Sudan, 53.
14. West, “Girls with Guns,” 184; Urdang, “Women in National Liberation Movements,” 214; Coulter et al., “Young Female fighters,” 12.
15. “Stated Position of the Rebels.”
16. The National Union of Eritrean Women, “A New Dawn for Women,” 106; Bernal, “From Warriors to Wives,” 129; West, “Girls with Guns,” 184.
17. Leonardi, “‘Liberation’ or Capture”; Leonardi, “Violence, Sacrifice and Chiefship.”
18. New Sudan Council Of Churches, “Come Let Us Reason Together,” 7; Jok, “Militarism, Gender and Reproductive Suffering.”
19. “Stated Position of the Rebels.”
20. De Groot and Peniston-Bird, A Soldier and a Woman, 8.
21. Loring Goldman, Female Soldiers, 5.
22. Interview, 4/4/2009a.
23. Nyaba, Politics of Liberation, 53.
24. The first and main SPLA training bases in Ethiopia consisted of Itang, Bonga and Bilpam. Johnson, The Root Causes, 70.
25. Interview, 4/4/2009a.
26. Interview, 20/10/2010.
27. Interviews, 6/5/2010, 4/4/2009a, 3/11/2010, 8/11/2010, 20/10/2010.
28. Interview, 20/10/2010.
29. Interview, 8/11/2010.
30. Interview, 20/10/2010.
31. Bubenzer and Stern, Hope, Pain & Patience, 28.
32. Interviews, 4/4/2009a, 20/10/2010.
33. Interviews, 4/4/2009a., 11/11/2010, 8/11/2010, 8/11/2010.
34. Interview, 4/4/2009a.
35. Pinaud, “Military Kinship, Inc.”
36. Macdonald et al., Images of Women in Peace and War, 4.
37. Interviews, 4/4/2009a, 8/11/2010; Waters and Call, “No Standing, Few Prospects,” 2; Davis et al., “Regional Security, Gender Identity” 47; Bubenzer and Stern, Hope, Pain & Patience, 29; Weber, “Barbarian Beasts,” 276.
38. Interviews, 21/5/2009, 21/10/2010.
39. Enloe, Does Khaki Become You?, 37; Interview, 22/6/2010; Hutchinson and Jok, “Gendered Violence,” 101.
40. Crim, “Silent Partners,” 27.
41. Loring Goldman, Female Soldiers, 11.
42. Interviews, 4/4/2009a., 10/11/2010.
43. Interviews, 4/4/2009a, 3/11/2010.
44. Johnson, The Root Causes, 66.
45. Interview, 5/10/2010b.
46. Interview, 3/11/2010.
47. Interview, 18/8/2014
48. Interviews, 3/11/2010, 27/4/2009.
49. Interviews, 27/4/2009, 5/10/2010b.
50. Interviews, 5/10/2010b, 11/11/2010.
51. Interview, 5/10/2010b.
52. West, “Girls with Guns,” 183; Bernal, “From Warriors to Wives,” 133.
53. Interviews, 8/11/2010, 9/11/2010.
54. Interview, 8/11/2010.
55. Interviews, 5/10/2010b, 10/11/2010.
56. Interview, 3/11/2010.
57. Hughes, “Armed Conflict,” 178.
58. “The Interim Constitution” 7.
59. Johnson, The Root Causes, 100–1; “S/RES/1325 (2000)”; Waters and Call, “No Standing, Few Prospects,” 4.
60. Weber, “Barbarian Beasts,” 275.
61. SSCCSE et al., “Gender-Based Violence and Protection Survey”; “Assessment of Women Associated with the SPLA,” 7.
62. Stoff, “They Fought for Russia,” 74.
63. Interviews, 20/10/2010, 18/8/2014.
64. Interview, 10/11/2010.
65. West, “Girls with Guns,” 190.
66. Interview, 18/8/2014.
67. Interview, 10/11/2010.
68. Interview, 3/11/2010
69. Interviews, 10/11/2010, 8/11/2010.
70. Coulter et al., “Young Female fighters,” 8.
71. Interviews, 10/11/2010, 3/11/2010, 5/11/2010.
72. Interview, 18/8/2014
73. Evans-Pritchard, Kinship and Marriage, 26.
74. Interview, 8/11/2010
75. Interviews, 3/11/2010, 19/3/2009.
76. Interview, 14/5/2009.
77. Interviews, 10/11/2010, 5/10/2010b.
78. Interview, 8/11/2010.
79. Interviews, 11/11/2010, 21/4/2009, 20/10/2010, 6/11/2010.
80. James, War and Survival, 63; “Reintegration Project for Women.,” 3.
81. Johnson, The Root Causes, 132–3.
82. Interviews, 11/11/2010, 6/11/2010.
83. Interview, 27/4/2009.
84. “Food and Power in Sudan,” 82–4; Rone, Prendergast, and Sorensen, “Civilian Devastation,” 119, 124; “Sudan: The Lost Boys.”; Mulu, “SPLA Red Army Marches.”
85. Interviews, 9/11/2010, 8/11/2010.
86. Interview, 8/11/2010.
87. Interviews, 9/11/2010, 8/11/2010, 8/11/2010, 2/4/2010.
88. Pinaud, “Are ‘Griefs of More Value Than Triumphs’?”
89. Interviews, 11/11/2010, 5/11/2010.
90. Interview, 8/11/2010.
91. Interview, 20/10/2010.
92. West, “Girls with Guns,” 185.
93. Pinaud, “Are ‘Griefs of More Value Than Triumphs’?”
94. Interview, 8/11/2010, 11/11/2010.
95. Robben, “The Politics of Truth and Emotion,” 83.
96. Interviews, 2/4/2010, 28/3/2010.
97. Interview, 11/11/2010.
98. Duany, interview; Preston et al., “Developing Integrated Approaches,” 8, 14, 15, 18; Rowe and Banal, “Sudan: Assessment,” 4, 11, 14.
99. Pinaud, “Are ‘Griefs of More Value Than Triumphs’?”; Interviews, 8/11/2010, 5/11/2010.
100. Interview, 18/8/2014.
101. Pinaud, “Are ‘Griefs of More Value Than Triumphs’?”
102. SSCCSE et al., “Gender-Based Violence and Protection Survey,” 2010.
103. Interview, 18/8/2014.
104. Vigh, “Navigating Terrains of War,” 10–11; Utas, “West-African Warscapes,” 408.
105. Johnson, “The fighting Nuer,” 510; Keen, The Benefits of Famine, 125.
106. Utas, “West-African Warscapes,” 406.
107. Pinaud, “South Sudan: Civil War, Predation And The Making Of A Military Aristocracy.”
108. Interviews, 5/10/2010b, 11/11/2010.
109. Weber, “Barbarian Beasts,” 136, 146, 149; West, “Girls with Guns,” 184.
110. West, “Girls with Guns,” 188.
111. Müller, The Making of Elite Women.
112. Bernal, “From Warriors to Wives,” 130.