A hole in the heart: Confronting the drive for evidence-based impact research in arts and health

Abstract

The field of arts and health, and associated academic discussion, is beset by a number of interlinked challenges which make it vulnerable to academic dismissal or, at best, poor visibility. One of these is a preoccupation with developing an evidence base of impact. This is compounded by resistance to definitions, disagreement over what constitutes appropriate evidence of success and inadequate consideration of the mechanisms of arts and health practice, as opposed to outcomes. We argue that increased attention should be paid to the description, analysis and theorising of the practice itself as the basis upon which the findings of impact studies can be understood and accepted. A literature review identifies some important emerging themes in community arts and health practice and some lacunae in need of further investigation. We conclude that an interdisciplinary theoretical framework for the practice could make a valuable contribution to the academic status of the field.

Keywords:

• arts and health
• participatory arts
• practice
• interdisciplinarity
• theoretical frameworks

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the reviewers of an earlier draft of this article for their valuable feedback and encouragement. The lead author's research is supported by an interdisciplinary studentship in social sciences and health from Durham University.