ABSTRACT
Ability to predict future trends is useful in the fashion industry, as it helps to increase competitiveness, reduce costs and contribute to improvements in the whole supply chain management. Hemline Index Theory (HIT) is a theory that the typical hemline of women’s skirts and dresses (hereafter, referred to as ‘skirts’) can be predicted from economic trends. This research tests the HIT in the Croatian context by using empirical data analysis. Monthly and quarterly women’s skirt data from 2004 to 2019 were collected from the Google Trends data via the Google search volume tool. Once the hemline lengths were calculated, they were processed with the economic growth data. The robust data analysis via the filtered probability of the recession showed that there is little to no evidence that HIT is valid in Croatia. Thus, the state of the economy cannot be used as a good predictor of future skirt length trends.
Acknowledgement
The author is grateful to the two anonymous referees and Simon and Caroline Durk of the ōbex project for language editing support.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1 Some of the examples include: economic state and recessions in Bortoli and Combas (Citation2015) and Tkacz (Citation2013); stock market return and volatility in Kim, Lučvijanska, Molnar, and Villa (Citation2019), Škrinjarić and Čižmešija (Citation2019), Škrinjarić (Citation2018, Citation2019), Bijl, Kringhaug, Molnar, and Sandvik (Citation2016), Habibah, Rajput, and Sadhwani (Citation2017); private consumption in Woo and Owen (Citation2019), Vosen and Schmidt (Citation2011); unemployment in D'Amuri and Marcucci (Citation2017) and Smith (Citation2016); energy consumption in Kaack, Apt, Morgan, and McSharry (Citation2017); tourism spending in Havranek and Zeynalov (Citation2018), Dergiades, Mavragani, and Pan (Citation2018).
2 This is due to the non-stationarity of price series for using it in the regression procedure. Moreover, all variables were used in their original form. The regressions had R2 of around 90%, which is an indicator that the variables could be non-stationary and the results could be spurious.
3 This is the most common assumption (Guidolin, Citation2011a, Citation2011b). If we assume changing matrix in (4), this would lead to an over-parameterization of the regime switching process (Ang & Bekaert, Citation2002).
Tkacz, G. (2013). Predicting recessions in real-time: Mining google trends and electronic payments data for clues, C. D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, Issue 387. Kim, N., Lučvijanska, K., Molnar, P., & Villa, R. (2019). Google searches and stock market activity: Evidence from Norway. Finance Research Letters, 28, 208–220. Škrinjarić, T., & Čižmešija, M. (2019). Investor attention and risk predictability: a spillover index approach. In L. Zadnik-Stirn, M. Kljajić-Borštnar, J. Žerovnik, S. Drobne, & J. Povh (Eds.), Proceedings of The 15th International Symposium on Operations Research in Slovenia, Bled, 25–27 September (pp. 423–428). Škrinjarić, T. (2018). Mogu li Google trend podaci poboljšati prognoziranje prinosa na Zagrebačkoj burzi? [Can Google Trends data enhance return forecasting on Zagreb stock exchange?]. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Mostaru/Journal of Economy and Business, 24, 58–76. Škrinjarić, T. (2019). Time varying spillovers between the online search volume and stock returns: Case of CESEE markets. International Journal of Financial Studies, 4, 1–30. Bijl, L., Kringhaug, G., Molnar, P., & Sandvik, E. (2016). Google searches and stock returns. International Review of Financial Analysis, 45, 150–156. Habibah, U., Rajput, S., & Sadhwani, R. (2017). Stock market return predictability: Google pessimistic sentiments versus fear gauge. Cogent Economics & Finance, 5, 1–15. Woo, J., & Owen, A. L. (2019). Forecasting private consumption with Google Trends data. Journal of Forecasting, 38, 81–91. Vosen, S., & Schmidt, T. (2011). Forecasting private consumption: Survey based indicators vs. Google Trends. Journal of Forecasting, 30(6), 565–578. D'Amuri, F., & Marcucci, J. (2017). The predictive power of Google searches in forecasting us unemployment. International Journal of Forecasting, 33(4), 801–816. Smith, P. (2016). Google's Midas touch: Predicting UK unemployment with internet search data. Journal of Forecasting, 35, 263–284. Kaack, L. H., Apt, J., Morgan, M. G., & McSharry, P. (2017). Empirical prediction intervals improve energy forecasting. PNAS, 114(33), 8752–8757. Havranek, T., & Zeynalov, A. (2018). Forecasting tourist arrivals: Google trends meets mixed frequency data. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, MPRA paper 90203. Dergiades, T., Mavragani, E., & Pan, B. (2018). Google trends and tourists’ arrivals: Emerging biases and proposed corrections. Tourism Management, 66, 108–120. Guidolin, M. (2011a). Markov switching in portfolio choice and asset pricing models: A Survey. In D. M. Drukker (Ed.), Missing data methods: Time-series methods and applications (Advances in Econometrics, 27) (pp. 87–178). Bingley: Emerald. Guidolin, M. (2011b). Markov switching models in empirical finance. In D. M. Drukker (Ed.), Missing data methods: Time-series methods and applications (Advances in Econometrics, 27) (pp. 1–86). Bingley: Emerald. Ang, A., & Bekaert, G. (2002). International asset allocation with regime shifts. Review of Financial Studies, 15, 1137–1187.