Bilingualism, a human right in times of anxiety: Lessons from California

Abstract

Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights refers to the individual’s right of expression without interference, “through any media and regardless of frontiers”. Currently, in some nations across the world, there is decreasing interest in cross-cultural interactions and a new interest in nationalism and assimilation, in communication within frontiers and in a specific medium: the national language. Speech–language pathologists (SLPs) advocate for individuals with communication disorders that interfere with their comprehension and expression. The profession promotes communication as a human right. Unfortunately, many clients and their families continue to report instances in which we, SLPs, limit their human right of expression by ignoring their home languages and recommending the exclusive use of the national language. Real progress requires reflection and action on language policy. In 1998, Californians passed Proposition 227, which eliminated bilingual public education. Then, in 2016, California voters approved Proposition 58 allowing the creation of multilingual and biliteracy programs. A discussion about the presentation of these two propositions to the public may hopefully help bilingual SLPs and advocates protect our multilingual clients’ human right of expression in these times of anxiety.

Keywords:

• Article 19
• Universal Declaration of Human Rights
• bilingualism
• multilingualism
• speech-language pathology
• United Nations

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Dr. Marlene Zepeda for her expert input on this topic.

Declaration of interest

There are no real or potential conflicts of interest related to the manuscript.