Evaluating the dose–response relationship of the number of sessions of “It Takes Two to Talk®” in young children with language delay

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the dose–response relationship between the number of It Takes Two to Talk® (ITTT) sessions attended and the language outcomes of young children with language delay and their parent’s responsivity in a multicultural clinical population.

Method

A clinical caseload of 273 early language delayed children (mean age 29.2 months, SD 7.8) and their families participated in parent group workshops and individual coaching sessions of the parent responsivity program ITTT. The children’s vocabulary and early syntax, collected using the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories and mean length of the three longest utterances respectively, were collated from pre- and post-intervention from pre-existing clinical data. Parental responsivity was evaluated utilising the Parent–Child Interaction checklist at three time points. Multilevel regression was used to determine the relationship between the number of sessions attended and outcomes, while accounting for covariates such as age and language spoken.

Result

ITTT dosage did not predict child language outcomes. Rather, vocabulary and early syntax outcomes were predicted by age, pre-scores and parent responsivity at the beginning of treatment. A higher dosage of ITTT did however positively predict parent responsivity, as did speaking only English at home. Socioeconomic status, gender and presence of receptive language difficulties did not contribute significantly to either child or parent outcomes.

Conclusion

A lower dosage of the intervention may be considered for parents and children with fewer known risk factors without significant implications.

Keywords:

• child
• language
• early intervention
• parents
• Hanen

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the families who participated in the study and the SLP services of SLHD and SWSLHD who collected the data and provided the intervention to participants.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no declaration of interest.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2022.2080270.