ABSTRACT
If climate change mitigation and adaptation are a human right, institutional change is needed that considers coastal ecosystem integrity as a common pool resource. Increasing risks in coastal zones necessitates adopting new and frequently controversial zoning, planning, and management practices, particularly as insurance programmes reform or require bailouts. In the U.S., current coastal policy frameworks employed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and state-level authorities incentivize defensive strategies, especially in high-value tourism destinations, despite critiques of inequity and longer-term evidence demonstrating that hardening shorelines shifts erosion patterns. Other coastal regions and developing countries that cannot afford defensive strategies – particularly rural, minority, and impoverished communities located adjacent to estuarine areas – rely heavily on ecosystem services for protection and will likely disproportionately face buyouts, forced relocation, and retreat as seas rise.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes on contributors
Matthew Jurjonas is currently a Fulbright-Garcia Robles U.S. Scholar at the Institute of Social Investigation at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. His research interests include sustainable rural development, community resilience for climate change, and climate justice issues in historically marginalized communities.
Erin Seekamp is an associate professor at NC State University. Her research focuses on partnerships, decision-making, and capacity building in relation to climate adaptation planning, community-based conservation, and conservation behaviours.
ORCID
Matthew Jurjonas http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1008-639X
Erin Seekamp http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5082-1921