25,476
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The greenhouse gas benefits of corn ethanol – assessing recent evidence

, , , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 361-375 | Received 08 Aug 2018, Accepted 01 Nov 2018, Published online: 25 Mar 2019
 

Abstract

In 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a life-cycle analysis of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with the production and combustion of corn ethanol. EPA projected that by 2022, the emissions profile of corn ethanol from a new refinery would be 21% lower than that of an energy equivalent quantity of gasoline. Since 2010, the 21% value has dominated policy discussions and federal regulations related to corn ethanol as a renewable fuel and a GHG mitigation option. It is now 2018 and new data, scientific studies, technical reports, and other information allow us to examine the emissions pathway corn-ethanol has actually followed since 2010. Using this information, we assess corn ethanol's current GHG profile at 39–43% lower than gasoline. We also develop two projected emissions scenarios for corn ethanol in 2022. These scenarios highlight opportunities to produce ethanol with emissions that are 47.0–70.0% lower than gasoline. Many countries are now developing or revising renewable energy policies. Typically, biofuel substitutes for gasoline are required to reduce GHG emissions by more than 21%. Our results could help position U.S. corn ethanol to compete in these new and growing markets.

Notes

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 The US gasoline supply consists of gasolines imported from many foreign regions and gasolines refined domestically from petroleum extracted from numerous domestic and foreign regions. The gasoline assessed in the RIA is a composite product constructed to represent the ‘average’ gasoline consumed in the United States in 2005 [Citation1, section 2.5].

2 To help readers quickly compare the methods of the RIA and our study, identifies key differences in data, models, emission factors and other information used in the two studies by emissions source category.

3 To make our results familiar to a wider set of people in other disciplines, presents emissions by source category for the RIA and our three scenarios in both g CO2e/MMBtu and g CO2e/MJ.

4 The regional breakdown, in acres, is in Rosenfeld et al. [Citation5; table 2-6, p. 18].

5 ARMS is an annual survey that collects data on the financial condition, production practices, and resource use for US farms. Each ARMS samples about 5000 fields and 30,000 farms that are representative of that year’s surveyed commodities.

6 For example, in Appalachia, 95.2% of acres apply nitrogen (N) and the average application rate is 173.01 kg/ha. Multiplying the adoption rate by the application rate gives an effective N application rate across the region of 164.70 kg/ha.

7 Our approach allows us to clearly distinguish between new acres brought into corn production due to increases in ethanol production, acres leaving corn production due to increases in supply of distiller grains and solubles, and the GHG impacts related to each set of acres (i.e. changes in emissions related to changes in farm input use and changes in soil carbon). Additionally, our approach allows us to account for the increase in average corn yields per hectare since 2010.

8 This table is reproduced in Rosenfeld et al. [Citation5, p. 82].

9 MOVES estimates emissions for mobile sources covering a broad range of pollutants, and allows multiple-scale analysis.

10 The term ‘sustainably produced biomass’ abstracts from several emissions-related issues that could accompany a large-scale increase in the use of biomass as a process fuel by ethanol refineries. For example, LUC and farm input emissions could change if large areas of land are shifted into energy crop production. The nature and GHG intensity of feedstock production geared to supply large quantities of biomass to the ethanol industry would likely vary by region, and even by refinery location. While an analysis is beyond the scope of this paper, we acknowledge that our HEHC scenario is likely a relatively low-emissions case.