Secondary School Students’ Understanding of Learning Contexts in Science Education: Perspectives from Ethiopia

Abstract

There is increasing recognition of the importance of learning contexts in science education. However, learning contexts are rarely articulated in terms of what they constitute and are often framed by educators and textbooks with limited inputs from students. Unless properly articulated, contexts become anything and everything, thereby losing their relevance for practical aspects of science teaching and learning. In this study, we examined secondary school students’ perceptions of learning contexts as they relate to their science learning and determined aspects of contextualising science education. We recruited 418 secondary school students (Grades 10 and 11) from eight schools in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia, to respond to a survey that has both closed and open-ended items. We used exploratory factor analysis to analyse the quantitative element of the survey and determine aspects of contextualising science teaching and learning. We also used open-coding and constant comparison to analyse students’ qualitative descriptions of learning contexts with the goal of determining students’ understanding of the concept as it relates to their science learning. Results from the factor analysis revealed four factors—agency and discourse, inquiry and processes, everyday life and community engagement and customising as aspects of contextualisation from students’ perspective. The results from the qualitative element reinforced those quantitative findings. Overall, results underscore the importance of contextualising as well as questioning the purpose of science education, especially, but not limited to, in low- and middle-income countries. The study has implications for learning design and fostering learner agency in science education.

Keywords:

• Learning contexts
• contextualising science learning
• students’ engagement
• science education

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Acknowledgements

This study was supported with funding from the ‘Context Matters’ programme of the Canadian Organization for Development through Education.