704
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A global comparison of suicide and non-suicide terrorism

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 105-124 | Received 31 Oct 2019, Accepted 13 Nov 2020, Published online: 22 Feb 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Suicide terrorism has become an increasingly popular attack strategy among terrorist organisations over the last 40 years. The number of empirical studies on suicide terrorism has increased, but further research is necessary to understand the strategies of terrorist organisations that engage in suicide terrorism. Using the Situational Crime Prevention (SCP) theory as the framework, this study examines whether suicide terrorism differs by region, attack type, target type, weapon type, and type of terrorist organisation from non-suicide terrorism in global terrorist attacks that occurred between 1981 and 2017. Bivariate and multivariate analyses show that relative to non-suicide terrorism, suicide terrorism is more likely to occur in the Middle East and Africa, involve bombing/explosion as attack type, explosives/incendiary devices as weaponry, target security forces, and be committed by religious-based terrorist organisations. The results of this research indicate that situational terrorism prevention approach needs to be revised to consider the role of ideology in terrorist attack strategy since the ideology of a terrorist organisation plays a significant role in suicide terrorism. The findings of the research and its policy implications are discussed, and further research is warranted to expand the base of knowledge about suicide terrorism.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 The original categories of for region were as follows: 1 = North America, 2 = Central America and the Caribbean, 3 = South America, 4 = East Asia, 5 = Southeast Asia, 6 = South Asia, 7 = Central Asia, 8 = Western Europe, 9 = Eastern Europe, 10 = Middle East and North Africa, 11 = Sub-Saharan Africa, 12 = Australasia and Oceania.

2 The original categories of attack types are as follows: 1 = Assassination, 2 = Armed Assault, 3 = Bombing/Explosion, 4 = Hijacking, 5 = Hostage Taking [barricade incident], 6 = Hostage Taking [kidnapping], 7 = Facility/Infrastructure, 8 = Unarmed Assault, 9 = Unknown.

3 The original 13 categories of weapon type are as follows: 1 = Biological, 2 = Chemical, 3 = Radiological, 4 = Nuclear, 5 = Firearms, 6 = Explosives, 7 = Fake Weapons, 8 = Incendiary, 9 = Melee, 10 = Vehicle, 11 = Sabotage Equipment, 12 = Other, 13 = Unknown.

4 The original 22 categories of target/victim type are as follows: 1 = Business, 2 = Government (General), 3 = Police, 4 = Military, 5 = Abortion Related, 6 = Airports and Aircrafts, 7 = Government (Diplomatic), 8 = Educational Institution, 9 = Food or Water Supply, 10 = Journalists and Media, 11 = Maritime (includes ports and maritime facilities), 12 = NGO, 13 = Other, 14 = Private Citizens and Property, 15 = Religious Figures and Institutions, 16 = Telecommunication, 17 = Terrorists/Non-State Militias, 18 = Tourists, 19 = Transportation (Other Than Aviation), 20 = Unknown, 21 = Utilities, 22 = Violent Political Parties.

5 We used the type of terrorist organisation instead of the ‘perpetrator group’ because we classified the organisations based on their ideological affiliations.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.