Publication Cover
Advances in Mental Health
Promotion, Prevention and Early Intervention
Volume 20, 2022 - Issue 3
196
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Outcome and efficacy expectation for mental health promotion behaviours: the effects of predicting behaviours and variations in demographics

ORCID Icon &
Pages 266-280 | Received 28 Jun 2021, Accepted 29 May 2022, Published online: 17 Jun 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Objective

This study examines the reliability and validity of the scale for outcome expectations (OE) and efficacy expectations (EE), two especially critical variables for predicting mental health promotion behaviour. Further, the relation between the two types of expectation and mental health promotion behaviour and whether these expectations varied according to changes in demographics were tested.

Method

An online, cross-sectional study was conducted with 2485 participants in Japan. Participants were asked about demographic characteristics, OE, EE and current practices of mental health promotion behaviours.

Results

Confirmatory factor analysis showed reliability and validity in both OE and EE. Further, the relation between the two types of expectation and mental health promotion behaviour was confirmed. Both OE (path coefficient = 0.18, p < 0.01) and EE (path coefficient = 0.62, p < 0.01) were associated with mental health promotion behaviour. Among variations in demographic characteristics of participants, small to medium effect sized generation gap of expectancy was found (OE: f = 0.13, p < 0.01; EE: f = 0.20, p < 0.01).

Discussion

The present study demonstrates the potential for determinant roles of OE and EE for mental health promotion behaviours. These findings may encourage mental health promotion behaviours for individuals from any demographic background.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Ministry of Health and Labour and Welfare (Project ID: H28-Roudou-Ippan-002). and JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number JP 20K14228). The authors would like to thank Enago (www.enago.jp) for the English language review.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded by Ministry of Health and Labour and Welfare (Project ID: H28-Roudou-Ippan-002) and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Project ID: 20K14228).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.