665
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

A transfectant RK13 cell line permissive to classical caprine scrapie prion propagation

, , , , &
Pages 153-164 | Received 10 Nov 2015, Accepted 10 Mar 2016, Published online: 23 May 2016
 

ABSTRACT

To assess scrapie infectivity associated with caprine-origin tissues, bioassay can be performed using kids, lambs or transgenic mice expressing caprine or ovine prion (PRNP) alleles, but the incubation periods are fairly long. Although several classical ovine scrapie prion permissive cell lines with the ability to detect brain-derived scrapie prion have been available, no classical caprine scrapie permissive cell line is currently available. Therefore, the aims of this study were to generate a rabbit kidney epithelial cell line (RK13) stably expressing caprine wild-type PRNP (cpRK13) and then to assess permissiveness of cpRK13 cells to classical caprine scrapie prion propagation. The cpRK13 and plasmid control RK13 (pcRK13) cells were incubated with brain-derived classical caprine scrapie inocula prepared from goats or ovinized transgenic mice (Tg338, express ovine VRQ allele) infected with caprine scrapie. Significant PrPSc accumulation, which is indicative of scrapie prion propagation, was detected by TSE ELISA and immunohistochemistry in cpRK13 cells inoculated with classical caprine scrapie inocula. Western blot analysis revealed the typical proteinase K-resistant 3 PrPres isoforms in the caprine scrapie prion inoculated cpRK13 cell lysate. Importantly, PrPSc accumulation was not detected in similarly inoculated pcRK13 cells, whether by TSE ELISA, immunohistochemistry, or western blot. These findings suggest that caprine scrapie prions can be propagated in cpRK13 cells, thus this cell line may be a useful tool for the assessment of classical caprine prions in the brain tissues of goats.

DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Authors declare that no potential conflicts of interest exist.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Donald P. Knowles for critical reading of the manuscript. The authors would also like to thank Linda Hamburg, Lori Fuller, Laetisha O'Rourke, Deborah Wolheter, Jan Luft and Emma Karel for technical assistance. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the US Department of Agriculture.

Funding

This work was supported by funds from the USDA Agricultural Research Service (CRIS 2090-32000-030-00D).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.