115
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Sports technology provides an objective assessment of the Paralympic swimming classification system

, , &
Pages 49-55 | Received 19 Jan 2012, Accepted 18 Jun 2012, Published online: 18 Jul 2012
 

Abstract

The Paralympic Games are the highest form of competition for an athlete with a disability and the fundamental distinction between the Olympic and Paralympic Games is the Paralympic classification system. Recently the International Paralympic Committee mandated the development of an evidence-based classification system for each sport. To create an objective Paralympic classification system this study firstly evaluated the current classification musculoskeletal protocols with swimming specific equipment. To mitigate against the numerous physical variations in people with a disability, 32 elite able-bodied swimmers were assessed. Using a custom-built bilateral swim bench ergometer and a 3D Motion Monitor (120 Hz) system, upper-limb kinematic and performance measures (hand force) were collected and compared to the musculoskeletal protocols. There were inconsistent and generally weak correlations between the current classification system range of motion scores, and the actual 3D kinematic range of motion, with similar weak correlations to hand force. Although not evident in the relatively static musculoskeletal protocols, important swimming specific asymmetry differences were identified in shoulder abduction/adduction along with external rotation, via the sports technology assessment. These findings highlight firstly the deficiencies in the current classification system, followed by the advantages of implementing sport-specific technology to objectively address this international issue.

View correction statement:
Erratum

Acknowledgements

This project had the support of the University of the Sunshine Coast and Swimming Australia. The authors would like to thank the athletes for their time to participate in this study. There are no competing interests or funding associated with this research.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.