Abstract
A response to Eliason, Samide, Williams, and Lepore that outlines Jennings' view of the existential nature of much post-Hegalian philosophy and therapy, and recommends Wilber's Integral theory as a more unifying one than existentialism. More specific points note that existential issues in therapy encompass a limited client population, that a developmental and cross cultural perspective is important, and that specific techniques related to trauma and deep belief structures need to be used in conjunction with a strong therapeutic relationship.