![Sample our Area Studies journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5922/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Area-Studies.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
While some researchers have studied the spread of sexually-transmitted infections and diseases (STIs and STDs), little attention has been paid to the subjective narratives of how women assess sexual safety and the possibility of contracting STIs when having sex with partners. This study analysed semi-structured interviews with twenty women from a diverse 2014 community sample collected in a large Southwestern U.S. city in order to examine how women assess safety and danger in partners with regard to their sexual health. I identified five themes in how women described assessing their risk for contracting an STI: 1) Avoidance and refusal to ask; 2) Intuiting safety or ‘just feeling’ they are STI-free; 3) Verbally asking and trusting their responses; 4) Checking for physical signs of STIs; 5) Asking that a partner get tested. Tensions about sexual health knowledge, entitlement to ask for proof of a partner’s STI status, and the gendered power dimensions of sexual health and sexual risk-taking are discussed. Ultimately, women’s overwhelming lack of effective measures to ensure their own sexual health and safety are put into conversation with discourses of sexual (dis)empowerment.
Acknowledgments
Special thanks to Laisa Schweigert, Laura Martinez, Eric Swank, and the Feminist Research on Gender and Sexuality Group for their contributions to this manuscript.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Breanne Fahs
Breanne Fahs is Professor of Women and Gender Studies at Arizona State University. She is the author of Firebrand Feminism, Women, Sex, and Madness, and Out for Blood, and is the founder and director of the Feminist Research on Gender and Sexuality Group. She also works as a clinical psychologist in private practice.