472
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Development of an FTIR based chemometric model for the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of cane sugar as an added sugar adulterant in apple fruit juices

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 539-551 | Received 07 Oct 2019, Accepted 06 Jan 2020, Published online: 05 Feb 2020
 

ABSTRACT

A Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy based chemometric model was evaluated for the rapid identification and estimation of cane sugar as an added sugar adulterant in apple fruit juices. For all the ninety samples, spectra were acquired in the mid-infrared range (4000 cm−1–400 cm−1). The spectral analysis provided information regarding the distinctive variable region, which lies in the range of 1200cm−1 to 900cm−1, designated as fingerprint region for the carbohydrates. A specific peak in the fingerprint region was observed at 997cm−1 in all the adulterated samples and was undetectable in pure samples. Based on different levels of cane sugar adulteration (5, 10, 15, and 20%), principal component analysis showed the clustering of samples and further helped us in compression of data by selecting wavenumbers with maximum variability based on the loading line plot. Supervised classification methods (SIMCA and LDA) were evaluated based on their classification efficiencies for a test set. Though SIMCA showed 100% classification efficiency (Raw data set), LDA was able to classify the test set with an accuracy of only 96.67% (Raw as well as Transformed data set) between pure and 5% adulterated samples. For the quantitative estimation, calibration models were developed using partial least square regression (PLS-R) and principal component regression method (PCR) methods. PLS-1st derivative showed a maximum coefficient of determination (R2) with a value of 0.991 for calibration and 0.992 for prediction. The RMSECV, RMSEP, LOD and LOQ observed for PLS-1st derivative model were 0.75% w/v, 0.61% w/v, 1.28%w/v and 3.88%w/v, respectively. The coefficient of variation as a measure of precision (repeatability) was also determined for all models, and it ranged from 0.23% to 1.83% (interday), and 0.25% to 1.43% (intraday).

Acknowledgments

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, Austria, financially supported this research through the research project entitled “Field Deployable Analytical Methods to Assess the Authenticity, Safety, and Quality of Food” (IAEA Research contract number - 22125). The authors would like to acknowledge the University Grant Commission, Delhi, for providing the fellowship. We would also like to thank the University of Delhi, Delhi, for providing technical assistance and Regional Horticultural Research & Training Station, Mashobra, Shimla, India, for providing the authentic apple cultivars to carry out this research work.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the International Atomic Energy Agency [22125].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.