The New Great Game of Caspian energy in 2013–14: ‘Turk Stream’, Russia and Turkey

Abstract

Rerouting South Stream through Turkey, Russia is striking at Azerbaijan and at potential Central Asian gas exporters to Europe. Over the last couple of years, under Baku’s lead, Azerbaijan and Turkey have been working on bringing to fruition the so-called Southern Gas Corridor (SGC), which aims to bring Caspian-sourced gas through the Trans-Anatolian Pipeline (TANAP) to the Turco-Greek border and, from there, to South-eastern Europe via the Trans-Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) and regional interconnectors. The goal of this paper is to examine Russia’s recent high-stakes game to threaten vital Azerbaijani interests, including the SGC, particularly developments since the cancellation of South Stream—or ‘Turk Stream’. ‘Turk Stream’ is likely to propel the Balkans and Ukraine into front-line states in a serious struggle between the European Union and Russia. Yet, the obstacles to ‘Turk Stream’ are considerable. It is by no means certain that Russia and Turkey can pursue antagonistic policies geopolitically and simultaneously maximize the benefits of their deepened energy relation and increased economic cooperation. And in its eagerness to become a gas hub, Turkey has severely limited the possibilities for Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Central Asian gas producers to break free of Moscow’s energy grip.

Notes

1. <www.wiadomosci.wp.pl>, 16 January 2015, <http://opinionsys.com/wiadomo-ci/news> (accessed 17 January 2015); requoted from Stephen Blank, ‘Russia gives EU, Turkey and Azerbaijan an ultimatum on “Turk Stream”’, Eurasia Daily Monitor, 12(13), 22 January 2015.

2. Hasan Selim Ozertem, ‘Has TAP ended the pipeline wars in the southern corridor?’, Turkish Weekly Journal, 1 August 2013; Julia Kuznir, ‘TAP, Nabucco West, and South Stream: the pipeline dilemma in the Caspian Sea Basin and its consequences for the development of the Southern Gas Corridor’, Caucasus Analytical Digest, 47(18), February 2013, pp. 2–8; Lusine Badalyan, ‘Interlinked energy supply and security challenges in the South Caucasus’, Caucasus Analytical Digest, 33, 12 December 2011, pp. 2–8; Julia Kuznir, ‘The Nabucco gas pipeline project and its impact on EU energy policy in the South Caucasus’, Caucasus Analytical Digest, 33, 12 December 2011, pp. 9–15; Dominique Finon, ‘The EU foreign gas policy of transit corridors: autopsy of the stillborn Nabucco project’, OPEC Energy Review, March 2011, pp. 47–69; Saban Kardas, ‘Turkish–Azerbaijani energy cooperation and Nabucco: testing the limits of the new Turkish foreign policy rhetoric’, Turkish Studies, 12(1), March 2011, pp. 55–77.

3. Agata Loskot-Strachota, ‘South Stream is dead. Long live South Stream’, Energy Post, 15 January 2015; Agata Loskot-Strachota, ‘Putin’s gas gambit: what’s next after South Stream’, Energy Post, 10 December 2014; Friedbert Pflüger, ‘Cancellation of South Stream is not retaliation, but a business decision’, Energy Post, 9 December 2014; Stephen Blank, ‘South Stream, Russia and Turkey: what does the deal mean?’, Turkey Analyst, 3 December 2014.

4. Jakov Milatovic and Peter Sanfey, ‘The Western Balkans and EU energy security’, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), 8 January 2015, <http://www.ebrd.com/news/2015/the-western-balkans-and-eu-energy-security-.html> (accessed 2 March 2015).

5. Ibid.

6. The Conference on ‘Security and Energy Implications for the South Caucasus after Ukraine’, The Kennan Institute, Woodrow Wilson Center, 28 January 2015.

7. Milan Simurdic, ‘Russian energy policy and the Balkans’, <http://www.isac-fund.org/.../06e-Milan%20Simurdic%20-> (accessed 20 February 2014).

8. Mehmet Ogutcu, ‘The game changers in world energy: geopolitical implications’, Turkish Policy Quarterly, 12(3), 2013, p. 56.

9. See Reuel Hanks, ‘Iran in Eurasia: geopolitical patterns and regional relationships’, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 14(3), 2012, pp. 313–315; Vassilis K. Fouskas, ‘Why Zones of Conflict is so annoying to some: a response to Bruce Kuniholm and others’, Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, 8(1), 2006, pp. 105–107.

10. Ogutcu, op. cit., p. 56.

11. Mersel Bilalli, ‘Utter isolation’, Skopje, Dnevnik, in Macedonian, 16–17 October 2010, Open Source Center, Foreign Broadcast Information Service, Central Eurasia (henceforth FBIS SOV), 17 October 2010.

12. Younkyoo Kim and Stephen Blank, ‘Russo-Turkish divergence (PART II): the energy dimension’, MERIA, Middle East Review of International Affairs, XVI(3), September 2012.

13. John Roberts, ‘Turkish–Azeri gas deal to hook up SE Europe’, Resource Investor, 17 November 2011, <http://www.resourceinvestor.com/News/2011/11/Pages/Turkish---> (accessed 3 March 2015); The Center for Economic and Social Development (CESD), ‘Azerbaijan–Turkey gas deal’s impact on supply to Europe’, 4 November 2011, <http://www.moldova.org/azerbaijan-turkey-gas-deals-impact-on-supply-to-europe-226330-eng/> (accessed 3 March 2015); Vladimir Socor, ‘BP’s South-East European pipeline: more questions than answers on Nabucco and Turkmen gas’, Eurasia Daily Monitor, 8(203), 3 November 2011; Interfax, in English, 28 October 2011, FBIS SOV, 28 October 2011 (accessed 20 February 2014).

14. Robert M. Cutler, ‘Anatolia gas pipeline races towards reality’, Asia Times Online, 4 January 2012, <http://www.atimes.com> (accessed 20 February 2014); Saban Kardas, ‘Turkey reiterates commitment to Southern Corridor with Trans-Anatolian Pipeline’, Eurasia Daily Monitor, 9(1), 3 January 2012.

15. Radio Free Europe Radio Liberty, ‘What’s China’s game in Central Asia?’, 21 January 2014.

16. Ibid.

17. Stephen Blank, Azerbaijan’s Security and U.S. Interests: Time for a Reassessment, Institute for Security and Development Policy, Stockholm, 2013, pp. 17–37.

18. BBC Monitoring, in English, 18 December 2013, FBIS SOV, 18 December 2013.

19. Claire Nuttall, ‘Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Turkey build a golden triangle of mutual investment’, Business News Europe, 17 December 2013, <http://www.bne.eu/story5611/Azerbaijan_Georgia_and_Turkey_build_a_golden_triangle_of_mutual_investment> (accessed 20 February 2014).

20. Vladimir Socor, ‘Baku spins its pipeline web’, Asia Times Online, 13 July 2012.

21. Rovnag Abdullayev, ‘Works on TANAP project may be started at the year-end’, 7 October 2013, <http://www.topnews.az/en/news/74061/Rovnag-Abdullayev-39Works-on-TANAP-project-maybe-started-at-the-yearendv39.html> (accessed 20 February 2014); Fabio Indeo, ‘Azeri gas reserves: a strategic key for the EU Southern Energy Corridor’, Global Energy Monitor, I(3), 1 March 2013, p. 4.

22. Socor, ‘Baku spins its pipeline web’, op. cit.

23. Alexandros Petersen, ‘Azerbaijan no longer has to rely on Western investment’, Azernews, 20 January 2014, <http://www.azernews.az> (accessed 20 February 2014).

24. Bucharest, Agerpres, in English, 17 January 2013, FBIS SOV, 17 January 2013.

25. Vladimir Socor, ‘Gazprom’s South Stream set back on several fronts’, Eurasia Daily Monitor, 7(169), 21 September 2010; Robert M. Cutler, ‘Turkmenistan signals Nabucco intentions’, Asia Times Online, 24 September 2010.

26. Dmitry Shlapentokh, ‘LNG provides new options for Turkmen gas

export to Eastern Europe’, Central Asia Caucasus Analyst, 9 January 2013.

27. Vladimir Socor, ‘Direct road to Europe: Azerbaijan’s Trans-Anatolia Gas Pipeline’, Eurasia Daily Monitor, 9(2), 4 January 2012.

28. Ibid.

29. Fatih Özgür Yeni, ‘Thinking beyond TAP: Turkey’s role in the Southern Energy Corridor’, IAI [Istituto Affari Internazionali] Working Papers 13(32), November 2013, <http://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iaiwp1332.pdf> (accessed 20 February 2014).

30. Ibid., p. 9.

31. Ibid., p. 5.

32. Shlapentokh, op. cit.

33. Ibid.

34. Vladimir Socor, ‘Projects in synergy: Trans-Caspian, Trans-Anatolian Gas Pipeline’, Eurasia Daily Monitor, 9(44), 2 March 2012, <http://www.jamestown.org/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=39086&no_cache=1#.VbMZ27Ptmko> (accessed 20 February 2014).

35. Azernews, ‘EU sees TANAP as key element of Southern Gas Corridor’, 5 November 2012, <http://www.azernews.az/oil_and_gas/46252.html> (accessed 20 February 2014).

36. Moscow, Interfax, in English, 5 December 2012, FBIS SOV, 5 December 2012.

37. Ibid.

38. Moscow, Interfax, 5 February 2013, FBIS SOV, 5 February 2013.

39. Tirana, ATA, in English, 9 February 2012, FBIS SOV, 9 February 2012.

40. Tirana, ATA, in English, 4 February 2013, FBIS SOV, 4 February 2013.

41. Podgorica, MNA, in English, 18 September 2012, FBIS SOV, 18 September 2012; Moscow, Interfax, in English, 6 July 2012, FBIS SOV, 6 July 2012.

42. Moscow, Interfax, in English, 17 September 2012, FBIS SOV, 17 September 2012.

43. Stephen Blank, ‘Russia’s unending Balkan intrigues’, Eurasia Daily Monitor, 12(108), 10 June 2015.

44. Moscow, Interfax, in English, 28 November 2011, FBIS SOV, 28 November 2011.

45. Tbilisi, The Messenger Online, in English, 8 June 2012, FBIS SOV, 8 June 2012.

46. Kyiv Post, ‘Azerbaijan hopes to become key gas supplier for Europe’, 13 March 2012.

47. Vladimir Socor, ‘Azerbaijan considers long-term strategy on natural gas exports, Part I’, 11(17), Eurasia Daily Monitor, 28 January 2014.

48. Ibid.

49. ‘Russia halts gas supplies to Ukraine after talks breakdown’, 1 July 2015, <http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-33341322> (accessed 5 July 2015); ‘Ukraine suspends Russian gas purchases in new price dispute’, Deutsche Welle, 30 June 2015, <http://www.dw.com/en/ukraine-suspends-russian-gas-purchases-in-new-price-dispute/a-18554787> (accessed 5 July 2015).

50. Elena Mazneva and Paul Tugwell, ‘Russia says Greece may borrow using its gas transit guarantee’, 23 April 2015, <http://www.washpost.bloomberg.com> (accessed 5 July 2015).

51. ‘Greece’s Russian card: Russo-Greek gas deal likely to infuriate Brussels’, Sputnik, 22 June 2015, <http://sputniknews.com/politics/20150622/1023706659.html#ixzz3egg2bGFG> (accessed 5 July 2015).

52. Margarita Assenova, ‘South Stream: bypassing Ukraine and dividing the EU’, Eurasia Daily Monitor, 11(83), 5 May 2014; Margarita Assenova, ‘South Stream not bankable after fresh US sanctions’, Eurasia Daily Monitor, 11(130), 17 July 2014.

53. Frank Umbach, ‘Ukraine’s cut-price gas deal with Russia is another “virtual discount”’, Geopolitical Information Service, 14 February 2014.

54. Illyan Vasilev, ‘Lessons about South Stream from Kiev and North Stream’, Sofia, Mediapool, in Bulgarian, 26 January 2014, FBIS SOV, 26 January 2014.

55. Belgrade, B2 Online, in English, 1 February 2014, FBIS SOV, 1 February 2014.

56. Moscow Times and Reuters, ‘South Stream pipeline viable, but legally risky’, 17 December 2013.

57. Kremlin, ‘Putin admits Russia trained S. Ossetians before 2008 Georgia War’, President of Russia, 10 August 2012, <http://www.kremlin.ru> (accessed 20 February 2014).

58. Dmitry Babich, ‘Will Ukraine split in two?’, 7 February 2014, <http://valdaiclub.com/near_abroad/66660.html> (accessed 20 February 2014).

59. Stephen Blank, ‘Russia and Europe in the Caucasus’, European Security, IV(4), Winter 1995, pp. 622–645.

60. Stephen Blank, ‘Russia and the Black Sea’s frozen conflicts in strategic perspective’, Mediterranean Quarterly, XIX(3), Summer 2008, pp. 23–54.

61. James Sherr, Hard Diplomacy and Soft Coercion: Russia’s Influence Abroad, Chatham House, London, 2013, pp. 61–62.

62. Moscow, ITAR-TASS, in English, 28 September 2009, FBIS SOV, 28 September 2009.

63. Tsvetana Krusteva, ‘Interview with Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shmatko’, Sofia, BTA Radiotelevizionen Monitor Online, in Bulgarian, 17 September 2009, FBIS SOV, 17 September 2009.