Abstract
This paper discusses the relevance of recent research on the economics of human development to the work of the Human Development and Capability Association. The recent economics of human development brings insights about the dynamics of skill accumulation to the literature on capabilities. Skills embodied in agents empower people. Enhanced skills enhance opportunities and hence promote capabilities. We address measurement problems common to both the economics of human development and the capability approach. The economics of human development analyzes the dynamics of preference formation, but is silent about which preferences should be used to evaluate alternative policies. This is both a strength and a limitation of the approach.
Acknowledgements
An earlier version of this paper was given with the title “Creating Flourishing Lives: The Dynamics of Capability Formation,” as the Amartya Sen Lecture at the Human Development and Capability Association conference held at Georgetown University, September 11, 2015. We thank Steve Durlauf, Martha Nussbaum, and Amartya Sen for their comments on the early version, and Steve Durlauf for his comments and conversations on this draft.
Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
About the Authors
Professor James J. Heckman is the Henry Schultz Distinguished Service Professor of Economics at the University of Chicago, where he has served since 1973. In 2000, he won the Nobel Prize in Economics for contributions to the field of policy analysis (the study of selection bias and for the evaluation of social programs). Heckman received his BA in mathematics from Colorado College in 1965 and his PhD in economics from Princeton University in 1971. He directs the Center for the Economics of Human Development at Chicago and is a senior research fellow at the American Bar Foundation.
Chase Corbin is a research analyst at the Center for the Economics of Human Development at the University of Chicago. He received a BA in Economics and Philosophy from the University of Florida in 2013, and an MA in Social Sciences at the University of Chicago.
Notes
2. For an early attempt to include nonmarket benefits in national income accounts, see Nordhaus and Tobin (Citation1973).
4. See Senior (Citation1836) for an early statement of this division: The business of a economist is neither to recommend nor to dissuade, but to state general principles which it is fatal to neglect, but neither advisable, nor perhaps practicable, to use as the sole, or even the principal, guides in the actual conduct of affairs.
5. Sen explicitly criticizes the utilitarian, consequentialist, Rawlsian, and libertarian theories of morality. See Sen (Citation2009).
19. In much of the capability approach literature, standard economic analysis is criticized for its inattention to the importance of personal health and nutrition, but such criticism is not well founded. Even the earliest work in the economics of human development acknowledged nutrition and choices that promote health as being investments in one’s human capital and a means for achieving more desirable outcomes. See Mushkin (Citation1962).
20. Robeyns (Citation2005, 193, Table 1) has a related diagram more in the spirit of capability theory, but does not isolate the role of skills.
22. Here, “parenting” is used in a very general way and includes parenting, extended family, schooling, and other environmental influences.
31. Geiser and Santelices (Citation2007) show how early grades predict later life educational attainment.
33. Bruni, Comim, and Pugno (Citation2009) attempt to unify the happiness literature with the capabilities literature. They focus on the recent development of surveys meant to measure subjective values and the importance of agency; evaluating agent’s agency over all possible functionings is argued as a means for better evaluating agency, freedom, and well-being. Such surveys, which include, among others, the world values survey relied upon in constructing domains of the OECD’s better life index, ask respondents to rank the importance of different domains of so-called self-direction or empowerment and include domains like “social status and prestige,” “hedonism,” “achievement,” “independent thought,” and “universalism.”
34. Groot (Citation2000) is one example of the effects of bias in such self-assessments.
36. Sen (Citation1999a, 44) considers and shows the difficulties with using this approach.
37. See Lancaster (Citation1990), who discusses the costs of decision-making among large numbers of choices.
38. Altruism and reciprocity, for example, are commonly considered as economic preferences that are important for making and maintaining social relationships and for interacting with one’s neighbors and peers. Dohmen et al. (Citation2010) report the correlation between preferences and skills.
43. Bowles, Gintis, and Osborne (Citation2001b) consider preferences that can provide incentives in favor of desirable outcomes, and that may shape noncognitive skills.
44. Alfred Marshall and Richard Ely gave arguments for improving life of the poor by shifting them towards Victorian morals. See, for example, Himmelfarb (Citation1995) and Ely (Citation1891).
47. In preparing the proofs of this article, we became aware of an interesting paper by Maurizio Pugno (CitationForthcoming) that draws on research by Scitovsky (Citation1992) to introduce dynamics into Sen's capability approach.
United Nations Development Programme. 2010. Human Development Report 2010: The Real Wealth of Nations: Pathways to Human Development. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Nordhaus, William D., and James Tobin. 1973. “Is Growth Obsolete?” In The Measurement of Economic and Social Performance, edited by Milton Moss, 509–564. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. Senior, Nassau William. 1836. An Outline of the Science of Political Economy. London: W. Clowes and Sons. Sen, Amartya. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. Sen, Amartya. 1985. “Well-being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984.” Journal of Philosophy 82 (4): 169–221. Sen, Amartya. 1991. “Welfare, Preference and Freedom.” Journal of Econometrics 50 (1–2): 15–29. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(91)90087-T Sen, Amartya. 1999b. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Robeyns, Ingrid. 2000. “An Unworkable Idea or a Promising Alternative? Sen’s Capability Approach Re-examined.” Center for Economic Studies Discussions Paper no. 00.30. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Robeyns, Ingrid. 2003. “Sen’s Capability Approach and Gender Inequailty: Selecting Relevant Capabilities.” Feminist Economics 9 (2–3): 61–92. doi: 10.1080/1354570022000078024 Foster, James E. 2010. “Notes on Effective Freedom.” OPHI Working Paper no. 34. University of Oxford, Oxford. Sen, Amartya. 1999a. Commodities and Capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Heckman, James J. 2008. “Schools, Skills, and Synapses.” Economic Inquiry 46 (3): 289–324. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00163.x Heckman, James J., and Stefano Mosso. 2014. “The Economics of Human Development and Social Mobility.” Annual Review of Economics 6 (1): 689–733. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-040753 Arrow, Kenneth J. 1973. “Higher Education as a Filter.” Journal of Public Economics 2 (3): 193–216. doi: 10.1016/0047-2727(73)90013-3 Spence, A. Michael. 1974. Market Signalling. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Heckman, James J., Jora Stixrud, and Sergio Urzúa. 2006. “The Effects of Cognitive and Noncognitive Abilities on Labor Market Outcomes and Social Behavior.” Journal of Labor Economics 24 (3): 411–482. doi: 10.1086/504455 Heckman, James J. 2008. “Schools, Skills, and Synapses.” Economic Inquiry 46 (3): 289–324. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00163.x Borghans, Lex, Angela L. Duckworth, James J. Heckman, and Bas ter Weel. 2008. “The Economics and Psychology of Personality Traits.” Journal of Human Resources 43 (4): 972–1059. Almlund, Mathilde, Angela L. Duckworth, James J. Heckman, and Tim Kautz. 2011. “Personality Psychology and Economics.” In Handbook of the Economics of Education, edited by Eric A. Hanushek, Stephen Machin, and Ludger Wößmann, 1–181. Amsterdam: Elsevier B. V. Lindqvist, Erik, and Roine Vestman. 2011. “The Labor Market Returns to Cognitive and Noncognitive Ability: Evidence from the Swedish Enlistment.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3 (1): 101–128. Sen, Amartya. 1985. “Well-being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984.” Journal of Philosophy 82 (4): 169–221. Sen, Amartya. 1991. “Welfare, Preference and Freedom.” Journal of Econometrics 50 (1–2): 15–29. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(91)90087-T Sen, Amartya. 1999a. Commodities and Capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Robeyns, Ingrid. 2000. “An Unworkable Idea or a Promising Alternative? Sen’s Capability Approach Re-examined.” Center for Economic Studies Discussions Paper no. 00.30. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Robeyns, Ingrid. 2003. “Sen’s Capability Approach and Gender Inequailty: Selecting Relevant Capabilities.” Feminist Economics 9 (2–3): 61–92. doi: 10.1080/1354570022000078024 Foster, James E. 2010. “Notes on Effective Freedom.” OPHI Working Paper no. 34. University of Oxford, Oxford. Bowles, Samuel, Herbert Gintis, and Melissa Osborne. 2001a. “The Determinants of Earnings: A Behavioral Approach.” Journal of Economic Literature 39 (4): 1137–1176. doi: 10.1257/jel.39.4.1137 Bowles, Samuel, Herbert Gintis, and Melissa Osborne. 2001b. “Incentive-enhancing Preferences: Personality, Behavior, and Earnings.” American Economic Review 91 (2): 155–158. doi: 10.1257/aer.91.2.155 Lochner, Lance. 2011. “Nonproduction Benefits of Education: Crime, Health, and Good Citizenship.” In Handbook of the Economics of Education, edited by Eric A. Hanushek, Stephen Machin, and Ludger Wößmann, 183–282. Amsterdam: Elsevier B. V. Heckman, James J., Jora Stixrud, and Sergio Urzúa. 2006. “The Effects of Cognitive and Noncognitive Abilities on Labor Market Outcomes and Social Behavior.” Journal of Labor Economics 24 (3): 411–482. doi: 10.1086/504455 Borghans, Lex, Angela L. Duckworth, James J. Heckman, and Bas ter Weel. 2008. “The Economics and Psychology of Personality Traits.” Journal of Human Resources 43 (4): 972–1059. Almlund, Mathilde, Angela L. Duckworth, James J. Heckman, and Tim Kautz. 2011. “Personality Psychology and Economics.” In Handbook of the Economics of Education, edited by Eric A. Hanushek, Stephen Machin, and Ludger Wößmann, 1–181. Amsterdam: Elsevier B. V. Sen, Amartya. 1999b. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mushkin, Selma J. 1962. “Health as an Investment.” Journal of Political Economy 70 (5): 129–157. doi: 10.1086/258730 Robeyns, Ingrid. 2005. “Selecting Capabilities for Quality of Life Measurement.” Social Indicators Research 74 (1): 191–215. doi: 10.1007/s11205-005-6524-1 Cunha, Flávio, and James J. Heckman. 2007. “The Technology of Skill Formation.” American Economic Review 97 (2): 31–47. doi: 10.1257/aer.97.2.31 Cunha, Flávio, and James J. Heckman. 2008. “Formulating, Identifying and Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation.” Journal of Human Resources 43 (4): 738–782. doi: 10.1353/jhr.2008.0019 Cunha, Flávio, James J. Heckman, and Susanne M. Schennach. 2010. “Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation.” Econometrica 78 (3): 883–931. doi: 10.3982/ECTA6551 Heckman, James J., and Stefano Mosso. 2014. “The Economics of Human Development and Social Mobility.” Annual Review of Economics 6 (1): 689–733. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-040753 Heckman, James J., and Stefano Mosso. 2014. “The Economics of Human Development and Social Mobility.” Annual Review of Economics 6 (1): 689–733. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-040753 Cunha, Flávio, and James J. Heckman. 2007. “The Technology of Skill Formation.” American Economic Review 97 (2): 31–47. doi: 10.1257/aer.97.2.31 Cunha, Flávio, and James J. Heckman. 2009. “The Economics and Psychology of Inequality and Human Development.” Journal of the European Economic Association 7 (2–3): 320–364. doi: 10.1162/JEEA.2009.7.2-3.320 Cunha, Flávio, James J. Heckman, and Susanne M. Schennach. 2010. “Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation.” Econometrica 78 (3): 883–931. doi: 10.3982/ECTA6551 Heckman, James J., and Stefano Mosso. 2014. “The Economics of Human Development and Social Mobility.” Annual Review of Economics 6 (1): 689–733. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-040753 Heckman, James J. 2008. “Schools, Skills, and Synapses.” Economic Inquiry 46 (3): 289–324. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00163.x Caspi, Avshalom, Renate M. Houts, Daniel W. Belsky, Honalee Harrington, Sean Hogan, Sandhya Ramrakha, Richie Poulton, and Terrie E. Moffitt. Forthcoming. “A Small Segment of the Population with Large Economic Burden: Childhood Forecasting.” Nature Human Behaviour. Elango, Sneha, Andrés Hojman, Jorge Luis García, and James J. Heckman. Forthcoming. “Early Childhood Education.” In Means-tested Transfer Programs in the United States II, edited by Robert Moffitt. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Borghans, Lex, Angela L. Duckworth, James J. Heckman, and Bas ter Weel. 2008. “The Economics and Psychology of Personality Traits.” Journal of Human Resources 43 (4): 972–1059. Bowen, William G., Matthew M. Chingos, and Michael S. McPherson. 2009. “Test Scores and High School Grades as Predictors.” In Crossing the Finish Line: Completing College at America’s Public Universities, 112–133. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Kautz, Tim, and Wladimir Zanoni. 2015. “Measuring and Fostering Non-cognitive Skills in Adolescents: Evidence from Chicago Public Schools and the OneGoal Program.” University of Chicago, Department of Economics. Hanson, Thomas L. 1999. “Does Parental Conflict Explain Why Divorce Is Negatively Associated with Child Welfare?” Social Forces 77 (4): 1283–1316. doi: 10.1093/sf/77.4.1283 Geiser, Saul, and Maria Veronica Santelices. 2007. “Validity of High School Grades in Predicting Student Success beyond the Freshman Year: High-school Record vs. Standardized Tests as Indicators of Four-year College Outcomes.” Research & Occasional Paper Series no. CSHE.6.07. Center for Studies in Higher Education at the University of California, Berkeley. Sen, Amartya. 1985. “Well-being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984.” Journal of Philosophy 82 (4): 169–221. Sen, Amartya. 1999b. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Robeyns, Ingrid. 2000. “An Unworkable Idea or a Promising Alternative? Sen’s Capability Approach Re-examined.” Center for Economic Studies Discussions Paper no. 00.30. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Robeyns, Ingrid. 2003. “Sen’s Capability Approach and Gender Inequailty: Selecting Relevant Capabilities.” Feminist Economics 9 (2–3): 61–92. doi: 10.1080/1354570022000078024 Foster, James E. 2010. “Notes on Effective Freedom.” OPHI Working Paper no. 34. University of Oxford, Oxford. Bruni, Luigino, Flavio Comim, and Maurizio Pugno, eds. 2009. Capabilities and Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Groot, Wim. 2000. “Adaptation and Scale of Reference Bias in Self-assessments of Quality of Life.” Journal of Health Economics 19 (3): 403–420. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(99)00037-5 Robeyns, Ingrid. 2003. “Sen’s Capability Approach and Gender Inequailty: Selecting Relevant Capabilities.” Feminist Economics 9 (2–3): 61–92. doi: 10.1080/1354570022000078024 Sen, Amartya. 1999a. Commodities and Capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lancaster, Kelvin. 1990. “The Economics of Product Variety: A Survey.” Marketing Science 9 (3): 189–206. doi: 10.1287/mksc.9.3.189 Dohmen, Thomas, Armin Falk, David Huffman, and Uwe Sunde. 2010. “Are Risk Aversion and Impatience Related to Cognitive Ability?” American Economic Review 100 (3): 1238–1260. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.3.1238 Heckman, James J., and Edward J. Vytlacil. 2007a. “Econometric Evaluation of Social Programs, Part I: Causal Models, Structural Models and Econometric Policy Evaluation.” In Handbook of Econometrics, edited by James J. Heckman and Edward E. Leamer, 4779–4874. Amsterdam: Elsevier B. V. Heckman, James J., and Edward J. Vytlacil. 2007b. “Econometric Evaluation of Social Programs, Part II: Using the Marginal Treatment Effect to Organize Alternative Economic Estimators to Evaluate Social Programs, and to Forecast Their Effects in New Environments.” In Handbook of Econometrics, edited by James J. Heckman and Edward E. Leamer, 4875–5143. Amsterdam: Elsevier B. V. Heckman, James J. 1990. “Varieties of Selection Bias.” American Economic Review ( Papers and Proceedings of the Hundred and Second Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association) 80 (2): 313–318. Heckman, James J., and Bo E. Honoré. 1990. “The Empirical Content of the Roy Model.” Econometrica 58 (5): 1121–1149. doi: 10.2307/2938303 Robeyns, Ingrid. 2005. “Selecting Capabilities for Quality of Life Measurement.” Social Indicators Research 74 (1): 191–215. doi: 10.1007/s11205-005-6524-1 Rossi, Alice S. 1965. “Women in Science: Why So Few? Social and Psychological Influences Restrict Women’s Choice and Pursuit of Careers in Science.” Science 148 (3674): 1196–1202. doi: 10.1126/science.148.3674.1196 Borghans, Lex, Angela L. Duckworth, James J. Heckman, and Bas ter Weel. 2008. “The Economics and Psychology of Personality Traits.” Journal of Human Resources 43 (4): 972–1059. Bandiera, Oriana, Iwan Barankay, and Imran Rasul. 2005. “Social Preferences and the Response to Incentives: Evidence from Personnel Data.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (3): 917–962. Einav, Liran, Amy Finkelstein, Iuliana Pascu, and Mark R. Cullen. 2010. “How General Are Risk Preferences? Choices Under Uncertainty in Different Domains.” NBER Working Paper no. 15686. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Bowles, Samuel, Herbert Gintis, and Melissa Osborne. 2001b. “Incentive-enhancing Preferences: Personality, Behavior, and Earnings.” American Economic Review 91 (2): 155–158. doi: 10.1257/aer.91.2.155 Himmelfarb, Gertrude. 1995. The De-moralization of Society: From Victorian Virtues to Modern Values. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Ely, Richard T. 1891. “Pauperism in the United States.” North American Review 152 (413): 395–409. Sen, Amartya. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2001. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2003. “Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice.” Feminist Economics 9 (2–3): 33–59. doi: 10.1080/1354570022000077926 Pugno, Maurizio. Forthcoming. “Scitovsky Meets Sen: Endogenising the Dynamics of Capability.” Cambridge Journal of Economics. Scitovsky, Tibor. 1992. The Joyless Economy: The Psychology of Human Satisfaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Additional information
Funding
This research was supported in part by the Pritzker Children’s Initiative; the Buffett Early Childhood Fund; NIH grants NICHD R37HD065072, NICHD R01HD054702, and NIA R24AG048081; an anonymous funder; Successful Pathways from School to Work, an initiative of the University of Chicago’s Committee on Education and funded by the Hymen Milgrom Supporting Organization; the Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Global Working Group, an initiative of the Center for the Economics of Human Development and funded by the Institute for New Economic Thinking; and the American Bar Foundation. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the funders or the official views of the National Institutes of Health.