ABSTRACT
The gut microbiome is involved in the bi-directional relationship of the gut – brain axis. As most studies of this relationship are small and do not account for use of psychotropic drugs (PTDs), we explored the relations of the gut microbiome with several internalizing disorders, while adjusting for PTDs and other relevant medications, in 7,656 Lifelines participants from the Northern Netherlands (5,522 controls and 491 participants with at least one internalizing disorder). Disorders included dysthymia, major depressive disorder (MDD), any depressive disorder (AnyDep: dysthymia or MDD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and any anxiety disorder (AnyAnx: GAD, social phobia and panic disorder). Compared to controls, 17 species were associated with depressive disorders and 3 were associated with anxiety disorders. Around 90% of these associations remained significant (FDR <0.05) after adjustment for PTD use, suggesting that the disorders, not PTD use, drove these associations. Negative associations were observed for the butyrate-producing bacteria Ruminococcus bromii in participants with AnyDep and for Bifidobacterium bifidum in AnyAnx participants, along with many others. Tryptophan and glutamate synthesis modules and the 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid synthesis module (related to dopamine metabolism) were negatively associated with MDD and/or dysthymia. After additional adjustment for functional gastrointestinal disorders and irritable bowel syndrome, these relations remained either statistically (FDR <0.05) or nominally (P < 0.05) significant. Overall, multiple bacterial species and functional modules were associated with internalizing disorders, including gut – brain relevant components, while associations to PTD use were moderate. These findings suggest that internalizing disorders rather than PTDs are associated with gut microbiome differences relative to controls.
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge and thank the late Marten Hofker who had the great wisdom and vision to initiate the Lifelines DAG3/Dutch Microbiome Project. The authors wish to acknowledge the services of the Lifelines Cohort Study, the contributing research centers delivering data to Lifelines and all the study participants. The Lifelines Biobank initiative has been made possible by subsidy from the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport; the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs; the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG); the University of Groningen (UG) and the Northern Provinces of the Netherlands. We would like to thank the Genomic Coordination Center (UMCG and UG) for their support and for providing access to their Peregrine, Calculon, Boxy and Gearshift high performance computing clusters. Metagenomics library preparation and sequencing was done at Novogene. We also thank K. Mc Intyre for English and content editing.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Author contribution
SB performed the analyses in this study, with assistance from AK, and drafted the manuscript. AK implemented statistical methods for association analyses. RG designed and implemented the metagenomic data analysis pipelines. JCS constructed gut – brain module tables. AVV, MFBG, SAS, MAYK, VC and LAB were involved in the extraction and cleaning of phenotypic data and other statistical analysis for the Dutch Microbiome Cohort. AZ, RKW, JF and CW conceived, coordinated and supported the Dutch Microbiome Cohort study. AZ, AK and HMvL conceived, coordinated and supported the current study. HMvL contributed to data collection regarding internalizing disorders. All authors critically revised and approved the manuscript.
Data availability statement
Scripts used for data analysis can be found at:
https://github.com/GRONINGEN-MICROBIOME-CENTRE/DMP and https://github.com/GRONINGEN-MICROBIOME-CENTRE/DMP_MentalHeath
Supplementary material
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2023.2281360