234
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Dynamic mechanical properties and constitutive model for jointed mudstone samples subjected to cyclic loading

, , , ORCID Icon &
Pages 7240-7266 | Received 17 May 2021, Accepted 19 Sep 2021, Published online: 09 Oct 2021
 

Abstract

The dynamic properties of rocks are of great significance to the stability and safety of rock slopes and geological engineering under dynamic loads (e.g. seismic load). In this paper, triaxial cyclic tests were carried out on jointed mudstone samples with the prefabricated half-through joint, and their corresponding dynamic properties and deformation features are explored and analyzed in accordance with the hysteresis characteristics and the residual deformation forms. Moreover, based on the obtained fatigue properties under test conditions of diverse dip angles, confining pressures and dynamic stress, a dynamic stress ratio Rs is proposed, which gives a logarithmic correlation with the fatigue life of mudstone samples. Finally, on the basis of the breakage mechanics and homogenization theory, a dynamic binary-medium constitutive model is proposed, and the validations accompanied with the comparisons to test results are also given. It shows that this model can not only preferably duplicate the typical features of hysteresis loops and the gradually accumulation of the residual strain, but also gives a good consistence with the deformation features and fatigue life obtained from cyclic tests.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Figure A1. Comparisons of laboratory and computed results under confining pressure conditions for θ=15°: (a) Test No. D15-0, (b) Test No. D15-1, (c) Test No. D15-2.

Figure A1. Comparisons of laboratory and computed results under confining pressure conditions for θ=15°: (a) Test No. D15-0, (b) Test No. D15-1, (c) Test No. D15-2.

Figure A2. Comparisons of laboratory and computed results under confining pressure conditions for θ=30°: (a) Test No. D30-0, (b) Test No. D30-1, (c) Test No. D30-2.

Figure A2. Comparisons of laboratory and computed results under confining pressure conditions for θ=30°: (a) Test No. D30-0, (b) Test No. D30-1, (c) Test No. D30-2.

Data availability statement

All data, models generated or used during the study appear in the submitted article.

Additional information

Funding

The authors appreciate the funding of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41472296), the China Geological Survey (Grant No. CitationDD20190717), and Open Fund Research at the State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.