577
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Godina revisited: a systematic review of traumatic lower extremity wound reconstruction timing

, &
Pages 259-264 | Received 22 Dec 2017, Accepted 16 Apr 2018, Published online: 02 Jul 2018
 

Abstract

Backround: Marko Godina suggested in 1986 that soft tissue coverage of traumatic extremity wounds within 72 h of injury optimizes outcomes. Decades later, these recommendations remain controversial.

Methods: We performed systematic review of the literature using keywords ‘free flap coverage’ OR ‘soft-tissue reconstruction’ AND ‘lower extremity trauma’ OR ‘tibial or fibular fractures’. Patients receiving free flap or local muscle or fascia flaps were included. Patients were divided into two groups, one receiving coverage within 72 h of injury (<72 h) and one after 72 h (>72 h). Primary outcome measures were partial and total flap loss, as well as infection. Use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) was noted. Descriptive statistics were performed.

Results: Twenty-one publications from 1986 to 2015 were included. The <72 h group had 295 patients and the >72 h group 972 patient. Total flap failure rate was 1.4% if coverage was performed <72 h after injury and 8.8% if >72 h after injury. Partial flap failure rate was 0.4% if coverage was performed <72 h after injury and 1.8% if >72 h after injury. Infection rate was 7.7% if coverage was performed <72 h after injury and 11.6% if >72 h after injury. Among the 182 patients in the >72 h group receiving NPWT, total flap failure rate was 3.6% and total infection rate 7.3%.

Conclusions: Total and partial flap loss rates, as well as infection rates, were lower when coverage was performed within 72 h of injury. Supporting Godina’s recommendation, early soft tissue coverage may be beneficial when circumstances permit. NPWT may be useful when reconstruction is not feasible within 72 h.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank April Adams for her help in preparation of the figures.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.