The value of remembered pre-operative quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) scores

Abstract

It would be useful if it were possible for the patients to recreate their pre-operative QuickDASH scores in audits where this score had not been recorded before surgery. We assessed the accuracy of remembered pre-operative QuickDASH scores among 229 consecutive patients and the value of a previously developed algorithm for correcting these scores. Real pre-operative scores and remembered pre-operative scores were compared after a mean of 21 months. Furthermore, the scores of a subgroup of 79 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, subacromial impingement, thumb basal joint arthrosis or Dupuytren’s contracture were corrected using an algorithm. The mean difference between remembered and real pre-operative scores for all patients showed heteroscedacity in the Bland–Altman plot. The scores of the 79 sub-analysis patients were homoscedastic. The mean difference between remembered and real pre-operative scores was 9 (SD 16, SEM 1.85). Correcting the scores of the sub-group patients using our algorithm decreased the variation only moderately. The remembered pre-operative score is too inaccurate to be useful in individual patients, also when using our algorithm. However, subtracting nine from the mean remembered pre-operative score in a group of patients with any of the above diagnoses gives the real pre-operative score within the 95% confidence interval of four above and four below the real score.

Keywords:

• Carpal tunnel syndrome
• QuickDASH
• remembered
• agreement
• Bland–Altman plot

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the regional committee for medical and health research ethics for central Norway

Additional information

Funding

Funding for the study was received from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.