Finger reconstruction with dorsal metacarpal artery perforator flaps and dorsal finger perforator flaps based on the dorsal branches of the palmar digital arteries – 40 consecutive cases

Abstract

Since the first description many variations of the dorsal metacarpal reverse island flap have been published but there is still uncertainty about which vascular component should be included for an optimal result. Therefore, it was the aim of this study to analyze vascular reliability and ischemic complications of dorsal metacarpal artery perforator (DMAP) flaps and dorsal finger perforator (DFP) flaps in our patient collective. We performed 40 of these flaps from the dorsum of hand and fingers for finger injuries. The choice of donor site was made according to the defect’s location. Patients were analyzed with respect to flap necrosis, ischemic complications and achievement of overall reconstruction goals. In addition, we divided our patients in two groups, one group where we raised the flap from the dorsum of the proximal phalanx and a second one where the flaps were raised from the intermetacarpal space to identify complication rates based on the pedicles location. Of the 40 flaps, 36 survived completely. 4 partial necroses were observed in flaps transferred to more distal defects and in one flap that was used in a wrap-around technique for both dorsal and palmar proximal phalanx. These perforator flaps are a reliable method to cover finger defects and the dorsal metacarpal artery is not necessary for their survival, since the blood supply comes from perforating branches of the palmar vascular system. There is a clear trend for a higher complication rate in flaps raised from the dorsum of the fingers compared to the intermetacarpal space.

Keywords:

• Finger reconstruction
• pedicled flaps
• dorsal metacarpal artery
• outcome

Ethical approval

This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee Zurich.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).