Trichloroethylene and Human Cancer

Abstract

Evidence to suggest that trichloroethylene may be a human carcinogen comes mainly from two small epidemiological studies with supporting evidence from human toxicity and genotoxicity studies and from rodent cancer bioassays. Careful analysis of these data reveal marked inconsistencies between the data, differences in the conclusions drawn by various authorities reviewing the same data and, for certain key human studies, a complete absence of exposure data. Much of the rodent cancer data may be dismissed as not indicative of a human hazard because the tumors result from either peroxisome proliferation, or as a consequence of exceptionally high metabolic rates that are found uniquely in mouse tissues, or because the tumors only occur in the presence of overt toxicity. A common mechanism invoked to account for the development of renal tumors in both rats and humans is unproven, there is contrary evidence to suggest that this mechanism does not result in renal cancer, and alternative mechanisms have been proposed. Overall, the uncertainty and lack of consistency throughout the trichloroethylene studies, whether they are in humans, in animals, or in tests in vitro, lead to the conclusion that it would be wholly inappropriate to classify trichloroethylene as a human carcinogen.

Keywords:

• trichloroethylene
• human cancer
• review.