Harming is more intentional than helping because it is more probable: the underlying influence of probability on the Knobe effect

ABSTRACT

Knobe [2003. Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language. Analysis, 63, 190–194] demonstrated that people’s intentionality judgments in side effects depend on the outcome of the side-effect, indicating that people’s judgments of intentionality of action depend on not only the intention of the actor but also on the result of the action. However, on the basis of findings in judgment and decision making, the current study proposes another hypothesis to Knobe’s (2003) results: the participants’ intentionality judgments are related to not only the outcomes themselves but also the probabilities of outcomes predicted from the action. To test this hypothesis, the present study employed an identical experimental procedure to Knobe (2003), except that it required not only intentionality but also probability judgments for outcomes that resulted from the actions of a company president. The results replicated the findings of Knobe (2003) and showed a relationship between probability and intentionality judgment.

KEYWORDS:

• Intentionality
• Knobe effect
• probability
• outcome

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [grant number: 26380853].