Encountering Rural Transformation: A Catalyst for Exchanging Narratives of Place?

Abstract

While the major cities in Denmark experience population growth, the villages in surrounding rural areas face abandonment and decay. European Union and state funds are used for the demolition of abandoned houses and the rapid eradication of cultural values under the guise of state-authorized clean-up projects. This paper outlines an attempt to establish a counter-practice of radical preservation based on a series of transformations of abandoned buildings in various rural villages. The main focus is on one particular transformation, “The controlled ruin at the church,” as it explored the responses of the local community throughout the entire period since the start of the project in March 2014. The aim of this transformation was to reveal and preserve material and immaterial values endangered by the forthcoming demolition such as aspects of cultural heritage, local narratives, and building density. The presence of “The controlled ruin at the church” in the rural village catalyzed an exchange of memories of the place among the local inhabitants. Furthermore, the subsequent decay process showed a positive influence on the local attitude towards the implemented strategy. Bringing in surveyed examples of a ruinous village on the Italian island of Sicily, a depleted extraction plant in Germany and the sudden depopulation of the US city of Detroit, Michigan, the emerging counter-practice is contextualized to international efforts in the field and precedents of revitalized ruins.

Keywords:

• transformation
• rural
• villages
• abandonment
• decay

Notes

1. UN Population Division, World Urbanization Prospects (2008); N. B. Grimm et al., “Global Change and the Ecology of Cities,” Science 319, no. 5864 (February 8, 2008): 756–760.

2. See the Creative Practice Conference and Johan Verbeke, ed., Papers (Brussels: ADAPT-r, 2014).

3. Pieter Versteegh, Alter Rurality: Exploring Representations and ‘Repeasantations’ (Arena, 2015), 27.

4. Donald A Schön, Den reflekterende praktiker: hvordan professionelle tænker når de arbejder (Århus: Klim, 2001).

5. Richard Blythe and Leon van Schaik, “What if Design Practice Matters?,” in Design Research in Architecture: An Overview (Design Research in Architecture), ed. Murray Fraser (Burlington: Ashgate, 2014), 62.

6. Mo Krag, Encounter through Action! (Aarhus: Arkipelaget, 2015).

7. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (Paris: UNESCO, 2003).

8. Maurice Halbwachs and Lewis A. Coser, On Collective Memory, The Heritage of Sociology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).

9. Ellen Braae, Beauty Redeemed: Recycling Post-Industrial Landscapes (Risskov: Ikaros, 2015).

10. Mo Krag, “The Controlled Ruin: Preserving Collective Memories through Building Transformation.” Future Anterior 13, no. 1 (2016): 147–154.

11. Manuel J. Martín-Hernández, “Time and Authenticity,” Future Anterior 11 (2014): 40–47.

12. Braae, Beauty Redeemed.

13. Mo Krag, “Transformation on Abandonment: Toward a Critical Practice in Preservation of Rural Identity,” Spaces and Flows: An International Journal of Urban and ExtraUrban Studies 8, no. 1 (2016): 1–17.

14. Robert Smithson and Jack D. Flam, Robert Smithson, the Collected Writings (Documents of Twentieth-Century Art) (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996).

15. Gordon Matta-Clark et al. (eds.), Gordon Matta-Clark: Works and Collected Writings (Madrid: Musee Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofia, 2006), 167.

16. Billedkunstneren no. 3 (2013).

17. Jorge Otero-Paillos and Ines Weizman, Future Anterior 12 (2015): iii.

18. Theodore Ziolkowski, “Ruminations on Ruins: Classical versus Romantic,” The German Quarterly 89: 265–281.

19. Ellen Braae, Konvertering af Ruinøse Industrilandskaber (Aarhus: Arkitektskolen i Aarhus, 2003).

20. Daryl Lee, “Baudelaire’s ‘Paysage’ and the Commune Ruins Picturesque,” Romance Notes 45, no. 1 (2014).

21. Rachel Teukolsky, “Modernist Ruskin, Victorian Baudelaire: RevisioningNineteenth-Century Aesthetics,” PMLA 122, no. 3 (2007): 711–727.

22. John Ruskin, The Seven Lamps of Architecture (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1988).

23. Thomas Bo Jensen, Inger Og Johannes Exner (Risskov: Ikaros, 2012).

24. Benjamin in Naomi Stead, “The Value of Ruins: Allegories of Destruction in Benjamin and Speer.” Form/Work: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Built Environment, no. 6 (2003): 63–64.

25. Mo Krag, Spaces and Flows: An International Journal of Urban and ExtraUrban Studies (Chicago, IL: Common Ground, 2016).

26. Julia Hell and Andreas Schönle (eds.), Ruins of Modernity, Politics, History, and Culture: A Series from the International Institute at the University of Michigan (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010).

27. Braae, Beauty Redeemed.

28. Philipp Oswalt et al., (eds.), International Research, Shrinking Cities, ed. Philipp Oswalt (Vol. 1) (Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz, 2005). This is a project of the Kulturstiftung des Bundes (German Federal Cultural Foundation) in cooperation with the Project Office Philipp Oswalt, the Museum of Contemporary Art Leipzig, and the Bauhaus Dessau Foundation.

29. See http://www.forladtefacader.dk/

30. John Eugene Haas and Robert S. Ayre, The Western Sicily Earthquake of 1968: A Report (Washington: National Academy of Sciences, 1969).