Publication Cover
PaleoAmerica
A journal of early human migration and dispersal
Volume 4, 2018 - Issue 1
3,745
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Briefs

New Research at Paisley Caves: Applying New Integrated Analytical Approaches to Understanding Stratigraphy, Taphonomy, and Site Formation Processes

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon & show all

ABSTRACT

Paisley Caves in Oregon has become well known due to early dates, and human presence in the form of coprolites, found to contain ancient human DNA. Questions remain over whether the coprolites themselves are human, or whether the DNA is mobile in the sediments. This brief introduces new research applying an integrated analytical approach combining sediment micromorphology and lipid biomarker analysis, which aims to resolve these problems.

The Five Mile Point Paisley Caves are located in south-central Oregon in the northern Great Basin (Jenkins Citation2007). Research conducted there provides the earliest well-accepted evidence for human settlement of the Great Basin, including culturally modified bone, lithic tools, and human coprolites recovered in association with Pleistocene large mammal remains. Radiocarbon analysis of the coprolites indicates humans occupied the cave as early as 14,300 cal yr BP (Gilbert et al. Citation2008; Hockett and Jenkins Citation2013; Jenkins Citation2007), with periodic occupation from 14,300 cal yr BP through the historic period (Jenkins Citation2007; Jenkins et al. Citation2012, Citation2013).

The earliest date was obtained from a coprolite dated between 14,170 to 14,340 cal yr BP, which was found to contain ancient human DNA (Gilbert et al. Citation2008); however, questions have been raised over the aDNA recovery and stratigraphic integrity (Poinar et al. Citation2009). It has also been argued that microscopically, the coprolites resembled animal rather than human feces (Goldberg, Berna, and Macphail Citation2009). The latter was based on comparison of the Paisley coprolites with those of Viking humans and modern camels. With a subject that attracts great academic and public interest, it is important that such evidence is scrutinized, but there are aspects of this criticism which are flawed. Comparing Palaeoindian and Viking samples does not take into account major dietary differences between these populations, or the different preservation contexts and diagenetic processes. Previous research has demonstrated that microscopic methods are not a reliable way of identifying the species of coprolites; prehistoric coprolites from Turkey, identified as animal on the basis of inclusions (i.e., bone fragments and plant tissues), in fact contained distributions of sterols and bile acids indicative of a human source (Shillito et al. Citation2011).

In our ongoing study, we are using sterols and bile acids (lipids) as a species indicator, as the sterol profile varies according to whether an organism has a meat-dominant, omnivorous, or herbivorous diet, whilst the bile acid profile is distinct to particular species. Human coprolites are distinguished by the presence of lithocholic acid and deoxycholic acid, with a dominance of the former (Bull et al. Citation2002). Sistiaga et al. (Citation2014) analyzed one coprolite from Paisley Caves and argued that the sterol profile was consistent with an animal origin, but their analysis neglected to make a parallel analysis of bile acids, which are necessary for separating humans from other omnivores and herbivores. Their conclusion also does not take into account the fact that meat may have been a minor or seasonally variable dietary component of early populations. Moreover, results from a single coprolite cannot be extrapolated to the entire occupational history of the caves. An archive of over 1800 coprolites throughout the Paisley Caves sequence provides an opportunity to examine changes in diet at a high resolution, as well as to provide information on species lipid biomarkers in coprolites, in combination with microfossil analyses, allowing inferences on dietary inputs. Recent investigations of microfossils including phytoliths and starch grains have shown promise for providing detail on the plant component of diet in this region (Herzog Citation2014; Louderback and Pavlik Citation2017; Morris et al. Citation2009).

Any study using sterols as dietary indicators must take into account dietary composition. Sterols by themselves only give an indication of the broad dietary inputs, i.e., whether there is an emphasis on plants or meat. A more holistic approach, incorporating the analysis of other lipid compounds extant within the coprolite, will provide a better indicator of dietary composition. The earliest subsistence data for the Great Basin indicates that Pleistocene foragers had a diverse diet consisting of a variety of medium-sized mammals, birds, insects, fish, shellfish, and plant resources (Goebel et al. Citation2011; Hockett Citation2007; Rhode and Louderback Citation2007). Pleistocene foragers in the Great Basin may have targeted lower-ranking resources such as plants and seeds when higher-ranking foods were unavailable, and there were likely periods when their diet consisted mostly of plant resources (Grayson Citation2011, 302).

While limited to a few samples, previous studies at the Paisley Caves also indicate the potential that coprolites hold for reconstructing past human subsistence. Pollen, phytolith, faunal, macrobotanical, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and protein residue analyses conducted on coprolites from the earliest occupation of Paisley Caves provide evidence for consumption of large, medium, and small mammals, as well as birds and plant resources (Aikens, Connolly, and Jenkins Citation2011, 59; McDonough et al. Citation2012). On a broader scale, microfossil, macrofossil, and lipid analyses of coprolites recovered from dry cave settings throughout the Great Basin provide important direct evidence of prehistoric subsistence patterns (Callen and Martin Citation1969; Eiselt Citation1997; Fry Citation1976; Holm Citation2013; Martin and Sharrock Citation1964; Neumann, Holloway, and Busby Citation1989; Rhode Citation2003). Palynological studies conducted on sediment samples from the Paisley Caves indicate the potential of pollen analysis for paleoenvironmental reconstruction, and microfauna proxies also provide insights into local paleoenvironment (Beck, Bryant, and Jenkins Citation2017; Karkanas and Goldberg Citation2013; McGuire, Davis, and Brett Riddle Citation2013; Saban Citation2015; Saban and Jenkins Citation2013).

By combining lipid biomarkers with analysis of microfossils and macrofossils, we are working to provide a comprehensive analysis of all the dietary information contained within a single coprolite and separate animal from human. As coprolites are produced over a short period within the body, they provide dietary information at a very high temporal resolution, contrasting with traditional dietary proxies in archaeology such as skeletal C/N isotopes, which give an average lifetime signal. An advantage of lipid biomarkers, compared to aDNA, is that lipids can be directly dated using compound-specific 14C dating of individual lipid molecules. Rather than dating bulk carbon within a macro sample, compound-specific data isolate individual compounds and provide a direct date on the carbon from that compound only (Roffett-Salque et al. Citation2016). The combination of compound-specific radiocarbon dating and seasonal micro/macrofossil dietary “packages” provide a very high resolution chronology, an analysis of resource use and human-environment relationships, and how these change over the long-term occupation of the site.

Besides providing a new approach to the study of early diets, we are addressing potential movement of molecules within the cave sediments by integrating sediment micromorphology with lipid analysis of the sediments from which coprolites are recovered. Whilst analysis of biomolecules is indicating variability in concentration throughout the sediment profile, micromorphology is revealing the physical processes by which they are moving. Our preliminary analyses have indicated that sedimentation processes at the site are complex, consisting of multiple episodes of aeolian and alluvial inputs interspersed with periods of human activity. Material eroding from the cave roof and walls is distributed throughout the sediments. Further build up is seen through accumulation of rat midden and associated burrowing. Whilst areas of intact deposits are present, it is possible bioturbation or other post-depositional processes are happening at the microscale. A series of overlapping micromorphology block samples have been collected covering the entire stratigraphic sequence in Caves 2 and 5 (). Initial observations of the first sequence from Cave 2 () have indicated multiple episodes of inwash resulting in water-lain silt lenses ((A)), with further features such as calcite coatings indicating water movement and translocation of fine material ((E,F)). These observations provide important clues about the complex taphonomy within the caves’ sediments, and will be invaluable in helping understand the distribution of lipid biomarkers in the sediments.

Figure 1 Profile from Cave 2 of the Paisley Caves, Unit 2/4C, showing location of pilot study micromorphology blocks (adapted from Jenkins et al. Citation2012).

Figure 1 Profile from Cave 2 of the Paisley Caves, Unit 2/4C, showing location of pilot study micromorphology blocks (adapted from Jenkins et al. Citation2012).

Figure 2 Thin section micrographs showing (A) water-lain sedimentary crust of silt lens slide 3; (B) charcoal fragments slide 7; (C) preserved plant tissues in dung pellet slide 4 in PPL; (D) showing same as C in XPL highlighting cellulose preservation; (E) bone fragment showing signs of dissolution and calcite hypocoating; (F) showing same as E in XPL highlighting calcite hypocoating.

Figure 2 Thin section micrographs showing (A) water-lain sedimentary crust of silt lens slide 3; (B) charcoal fragments slide 7; (C) preserved plant tissues in dung pellet slide 4 in PPL; (D) showing same as C in XPL highlighting cellulose preservation; (E) bone fragment showing signs of dissolution and calcite hypocoating; (F) showing same as E in XPL highlighting calcite hypocoating.

Table 1 Micromorphology samples collected from Cave 2, Unit 2/4C.

If their movement is found to be restricted, as is seen in experimental studies of soil lipids (Bull et al. Citation2000), we plan on using compound-specific radiocarbon dating of human fecal biomarkers in the absence of discrete coprolites to give a more precise date for the human presence in the cave. Whilst lipids are likely to be relatively stable, our observations have implications for aDNA, given that it is a much more mobile molecule.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This project is funded by Natural Environment Research Council Grant, reference number NE/P003001/1.

References

  • Aikens, M., T. J. Connolly, and D. L. Jenkins. 2011. Oregon Archaeology. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
  • Beck, Chase W., Vaughn M. Bryant, and Dennis L. Jenkins. 2017. “Analysis of Younger Dryas-Early Holocene Pollen in Sediments of Paisley Cave 2, South-Central Oregon.” Palynology. Advanced online publication, doi: 10.1080/01916122.2017.1319883
  • Bull, I. D., M. Lockheart, M. J. Elhmmali, D. J. Roberts, and R. P. Evershed. 2002. “The Origin of Faeces by Means of Biomarker Detection.” Environment International 27 (8): 647–654. doi: 10.1016/S0160-4120(01)00124-6
  • Bull, I. D., P. F. van Bergen, C. J. Nott, P. R. Poulton, and R. P. Evershed. 2000. “Organic Geochemical Studies of Soils From the Rothamsted Classical Experiments – V. The Fate of Lipids in Different Long-Term Experiments.” Organic Geochemistry 31 (5): 389–408. doi: 10.1016/S0146-6380(00)00008-5
  • Callen, E. O., and P. S. Martin. 1969. “Plant Remains in Some Coprolites From Utah.” American Antiquity 34 (3): 329–331. doi: 10.2307/278417
  • Eiselt, B. S. 1997. “Fish Remains From the Spirit Cave Paleofecal Material: 9,400 Year Old Evidence for Great Basin Utilization of Fishes.” Nevada Historical Quarterly 40: 117–139.
  • Fry, Gary F. 1976. Analysis of Prehistoric Coprolites From Utah. University of Utah Anthropological Papers No. 97. Salt Lake City: University of Utah.
  • Gilbert, M. T. P., D. L. Jenkins, A. Götherstrom, N. Naveran, J. J. Sanchez, M. Hofreiter, P. F. Thomsen, et al. 2008. “DNA From Pre-Clovis Human Coprolites in Oregon, North America.” Science 320: 786–789. doi: 10.1126/science.1154116
  • Goebel, T., B. Hockett, K. D. Adams, D. Rhode, and K. Graf. 2011. “Climate, Environment, and Humans in North America’s Great Basin During the Younger Dryas, 12,900–11,600 Calendar Years Ago.” Quaternary International 242: 479–501. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2011.03.043
  • Goldberg, P., F. Berna, and R. I. Macphail. 2009. “Comment on ‘DNA From Pre-Clovis Human Coprolites in Oregon, North America.’ Science 325: 148–148. doi: 10.1126/science.1167531
  • Grayson, D. K. 2011. The Great Basin: A Natural Prehistory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Herzog, N. M. 2014. “Starch Grain Analysis in California and the Great Basin.” California Archaeology 6 (2): 171–189. doi: 10.1179/1947461X14Z.00000000039
  • Hockett, B. 2007. “Nutritional Ecology of Late Pleistocene to Middle Holocene Subsistence in the Great Basin: Zooarchaeological Evidence From Bonneville Estates Rockshelter.” In Paleoindian or Paleoarchaic? Great Basin Human Ecology at the Pleistocene/Holocene Transition, edited by K. E. Graf and D. N. Schmitt, 204–230. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.
  • Hockett, B., and D. Jenkins. 2013. “Identifying Stone Tool Cut Marks and the Pre-Clovis Occupation of the Paisley Caves.” American Antiquity 78 (4): 762–778. doi: 10.7183/0002-7316.78.4.762
  • Holm, S. 2013. “Fecalphilia, or How Archaeologists Learned to Stop Ignoring and Start Loving Fecal Deposits.” Nevada Archaeologist 26: 63–71.
  • Jenkins, D. J. 2007. “Distribution and Dating of Cultural and Paleontological Remains at the Paisley Five Mile Point Caves in the Northern Great Basin.” In Paleoindian or Paleoarchaic? Great Basin Human Ecology at the Pleistocene/Holocene Transition, edited by K. E. Graf and D. N. Schmitt, 57–81. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.
  • Jenkins, D. L., L. G. Davis, T. W. Stafford Jr, P. F. Campos, B. Hockett, G. T. Jones, L. S. Cummings, et al. 2012. “Clovis Age Western Stemmed Projectile Points and Human Coprolites at the Paisley Caves.” Science 337: 223–228. doi: 10.1126/science.1218443
  • Jenkins, D. L., L. G. Davis, T. W. Stafford Jr, P. F. Campos, T. J. Connolly, L. S. Cummings, M. Hofreiter, et al. 2013. “Geochronology, Archaeological Context, and DNA at the Paisley Caves.” In Paleoamerican Odyssey, edited by K. E. Graf, C. V. Ketron, and M. R. Waters, 485–510. College Station: Center for the Study of the First Americans, Texas A&M University.
  • Karkanas, P., and P. Goldberg. 2013. “Micromorphology of Cave Sediments.” In Treatise on Geomorphology, Volume 6, Karst Geomorphology, edited by John F. Shroder and A. Frumkin, 286–297. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Louderback, L. A., and B. M. Pavlik. 2017. “Starch Granule Evidence for the Earliest Potato Use in North America.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (29): 7606–7610. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705540114
  • Martin, Paul S., and Floyd W. Sharrock. 1964. “Pollen Analysis of Prehistoric Human Feces: A New Approach to Ethnobotany.” American Antiquity 30 (2): 168–180. doi: 10.2307/278848
  • McDonough, K., I. Luthe, M. E. Swisher, D. L. Jenkins, P. O’Grady, and F. White. 2012. “ABCs at the Paisley Caves: Artifact, Bone, and Coprolite Distributions in Pre-Mazama Deposits.” Current Archaeological Happenings in Oregon 37 (2-3): 7–12.
  • McGuire, J. L., E. B. Davis, and Brett Riddle. 2013. “Using the Palaeontological Record of Microtus to Test Species Distribution Models and Reveal Responses to Climate Change.” Journal of Biogeography 40: 1490–1500. doi: 10.1111/jbi.12106
  • Morris, L. R., F. A. Baker, C. Morris, and R. J. Ryel. 2009. “Phytolith Types and Type-Frequencies in Native and Introduced Species of the Sagebrush Steppe and Pinyon-Juniper Woodlands of the Great Basin, USA.” Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 157: 339–357. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2009.06.007
  • Neumann, A., R. Holloway, and C. Busby. 1989. “Determination of Prehistoric Use of Arrowhead (Sagittaria, Alismataceae) in the Great Basin of North America by Scanning Electron Microscopy.” Economic Botany 43 (3): 287–296. doi: 10.1007/BF02858727
  • Poinar, H., S. Fiedel, C. E. King, A. M. Devault, K. Bos, M. Kuch, and R. Debruyne. 2009. “Comment on ‘DNA From Pre-Clovis Human Coprolites in Oregon, North America.’ Science 325: 148–148. doi: 10.1126/science.1168182
  • Rhode, D. 2003. “Coprolites From Hidden Cave, Revisited: Evidence for Site Occupation History, Diet, and Sex of Occupants.” Journal of Archaeological Science 30: 909–922. doi: 10.1016/S0305-4403(02)00270-4
  • Rhode, D., and L. A. Louderback. 2007. “Dietary Plant Use in the Bonneville Basin during the Terminal Pleistocene/Early Holocene Transition.” In Paleoindian or Paleoarchaic? Great Basin Human Ecology at the Pleistocene/Holocene Transition, edited by K. E. Graf and D. N. Schmitt, 231–250. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.
  • Roffett-Salque, M., J. Dunne, D. Altoft, E. Casanova, L. J. E. Cramp, J. Smyth, H. L. Whelton, and R. P. Evershed. 2016. “From the Inside Out: Upscaling Organic Residue Analysis of Archaeological Ceramics.” Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.04.005.
  • Saban, C. V. 2015. “Palynological Perspectives on Younger Dryas to Early Holocene Human Ecology at Paisley Caves, Oregon.” MA thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis.
  • Saban, Chantal V., and Dennis L. Jenkins. 2013. “Late Pleistocene to Early Holocene Paleoenvironmental Conditions at Paisley Caves (35LK3400), Cave 2.” Current Archaeological Happenings in Oregon 38 (4): 20–25.
  • Shillito, L.-M., I. D. Bull, W. Matthews, M. J. Almond, J. M. Williams, and R. P. Evershed. 2011. “Biomolecular and Micromorphological Analysis of Suspected Faecal Deposits at Neolithic Çatalhöyük, Turkey.” Journal of Archaeological Science 38: 1869–1877. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.03.031
  • Sistiaga, A., F. Berna, R. Laursen, and P. Goldberg. 2014. “Sterodial Biomarker Analysis of a 14,000 Years Old Putative Human Coprolite From Paisley Cave, Oregon.” Journal of Archaeological Science 41: 813–817. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.10.016