Abstract
Recent study in economic history has, in several ways, sought to explore the diversities existing within national aggregates and generalisations. Research makes plainer every year that the eighteenth-century industrial entrepreneurs were far from belonging to a single ideal type in class, creed or attitudes.1 When the industrial structure itself was so differentiated — as to such matters as the size of plant, the level of technique, or the relationship of enterprise to the ownership of landed estates or to foreign trade — it is no wonder that noble coal-owners, landed canal and railway projectors, wealthy merchants like the Finlays of Glasgow or the Reynolds of Bristol should qualify for the compliment of this title equally with traditional elite of the type — Quaker ironmasters, Unitarian cotton spinners, or even the dissenting yeoman turned industrialist. In turn, single industries which were virtually nationwide, like textiles or brewing (or even, in a different way, farming), possessed within themselves, at the same point in time, a complete spectrum of industrial organisation from household production through cottage workshop to powered factory. Such industries show, in consequence, as diverse a collection of business leaders, of entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs.
The Journal would like to thank Routledge for permission to reproduce this chapter from The transformation of England, London, 1979. The author would like to acknowledge with gratitude a grant to help with his research from the Houblon Norman Fund and owners of all MSS cited who made it possible. They allowed him to study many records still remaining in the breweries whose past they document. See P. Mathias, The brewing industry in England, 1700–1830, Cambridge, 1959.
The Journal would like to thank Routledge for permission to reproduce this chapter from The transformation of England, London, 1979. The author would like to acknowledge with gratitude a grant to help with his research from the Houblon Norman Fund and owners of all MSS cited who made it possible. They allowed him to study many records still remaining in the breweries whose past they document. See P. Mathias, The brewing industry in England, 1700–1830, Cambridge, 1959.
Notes
The Journal would like to thank Routledge for permission to reproduce this chapter from The transformation of England, London, 1979. The author would like to acknowledge with gratitude a grant to help with his research from the Houblon Norman Fund and owners of all MSS cited who made it possible. They allowed him to study many records still remaining in the breweries whose past they document. See P. Mathias, The brewing industry in England, 1700–1830, Cambridge, 1959.