898
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Communications

The attack on November 13, 2015: organisation of the medico-judicial unit of the Hôtel-Dieu Hospital in Paris

, , &
Pages 232-235 | Received 15 Jan 2020, Accepted 20 Apr 2020, Published online: 28 May 2020
 

Abstract

The main aims of a medico-judicial unit are to ensure the examination of assault victims or persons in custody and to perform sampling necessary for investigations. Forensic examination is essential to describe the wounds and to evaluate the consequences of an assault by determining days of total incapacity for work (ITT). After the Paris attack on November 13, 2015, 121 victims were examined at the medico-judicial units of Paris. An initial forensic certificate was issued by forensic physicians with an assessment of physical ITT. A consultation with a forensic psychiatrist was systematically scheduled on the same day to obtain a forensic certificate for the psychological ITT. The average age of the victims was (33 ± 7) years and the sex ratio was 1.26. Most victims were in the Bataclan concert hall (78/121 or 64.5%). Of the 121 victims, 73 (60.3%) had projectile lesions (bullets, bolts and nuts, metal fragments, etc.) and 48 (39.7%) had non-projectile lesions (bruises, hematomas, etc.). The average physical ITT was 27 days (0; 190). The evaluation of the number of days of physical ITT was often complicated as some patients were still in medical care at the time of the initial examination. This experience enabled the Paris medico-judicial unit to anticipate the management required should any future event of this magnitude occur. It also reinforced cooperation between the medico-judicial unit and other departments, mostly emergency services and the forensic psychiatric unit. The Paris medico-judicial unit was thus able to offer a unique place of care by providing both physical and psychological examinations.

Authors’ contributions

Nicolas Soussy collected and analysed the data, drafted the initial manuscript, reviewed and revised the manuscript. Laurène Dufayet drafted the initial manuscript, reviewed and revised the manuscript. Caroline Rey-Salmon and Charlotte Gorgiard reviewed the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals by any of the authors.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.