Negotiating a unified Atlantic naval command: Anglo-American summit talks and the impact of domestic politics

Abstract

From Trafalgar in 1805 to the Battle of Jutland in 1916, the Royal Navy was in its prime. It symbolised Britain's early industrialisation, safeguarded British trade, protected strategically vital sea lanes around the British Isles and the empire, and projected British power to far-flung corners of the world. Despite British acceptance of naval parity with the United States under the terms of the Five-Power Naval Limitation Treaty signed in Washington in 1922 (and the gradual establishment of the US Navy as the world's most powerful and important naval force), within Britain the Royal Navy remained highly respected and was popularly seen as a yardstick of British greatness. When plans for a unified Supreme Allied Atlantic Naval Command (SACLANT) under an American admiral were leaked in February 1951, furious British popular and political protest ensued. The plans appeared to be a slight upon the Royal Navy, an affront to Britain's status and maritime history, and a damaging reflection of the state of the Anglo-American relationship. The Attlee government was pilloried for accepting SACLANT in principle and, once restored to power in October 1951, Churchill pledged to seek alternative arrangements with President Truman. This article casts new light upon the consequent negotiations about the Atlantic Command at an Anglo-American summit meeting in January 1952. Specifically, it argues that understanding the conduct of these talks and ultimate British acquiescence requires careful consideration of domestic political considerations in Britain and the United States – an explanatory factor hitherto missed in the (surprisingly few) existing analyses of the SACLANT issue.

Keywords:

• Anglo-American
• Churchill
• Royal Navy
• SACLANT
• summit
• Truman

Notes

United States National Archives, Washington, DC (USNA), records of the Council of Foreign Ministers, records of international conferences, commissions and expositions, RG43, box 69, memorandum by Ridgway Knight, 10 Dec. 1951.

Maloney, Securing command of the sea; Marsh and Dobson, ‘Churchill at the summit’.

Sokolsky, Seapower, 16.

The National Archives, Kew (TNA), minutes of the Chiefs of Staff Committee, DEFE 4/40, ‘Supreme Allied Commander Atlantic’, 7 Mar. 1951.

Cited in Sokolsky, Seapower, 20.

TNA, Cabinet papers, CAB 21/3057, Ministry of Defence to Admiral B.J.S.M. Washington, 21 Dec. 1951.

TNA, Prime Minister's Office papers, PREM 8/1363, Ministry of Defence to Admiral Washington, memorandum for Lord Tedder from Chiefs of Staff, 27 Feb. 1951.

Hansard, vol. 484, 26 Feb. 1951, cols 1751–60.

See British governments and elections since 1945, available at: http://www.politicsresources.net/area/uk/uktable.htm (last accessed 1 July 2011).

Harris, Attlee, 481.

USNA RG59, box 2768, memorandum of a conversation at the State Department, 7 Mar. 1950.

Foreign relations of the United States (hereafter FRUS), State Joint Chiefs of Staff meeting, Pentagon, 21 Nov. 1951, vol. 4, pt 1, 985–9.

Harry S. Truman Library, Independence, MO (HSTL), papers of Harry S. Truman, President's secretary's file (PSF), intelligence file, box 252, CIA Report, ‘British general election and US security’, 13 Feb. 1950.

HSTL, PSF, intelligence file, box 252, ‘British general election and US security’, CIA report, 13 Feb. 1950; USNA RG218, box 20, memorandum, Chief of Staff US Army to Joint Chiefs of Staff, 19 Apr. 1950, enclosure B.

‘Atlantic defence’, The Times, 27 Feb. 1951, 5.

White Paper, ‘System of command’, Cmnd 8214.

Hansard, vol. 494, 6 Dec. 1951, cols 2591–688.

ibid.

Gallup, ‘The Gallup poll’, 16.

J.M. Jones, ‘Mid-term seat loss 36’. Accessed at: http://www.gallup.com/poll/141812/avg-midterm-seat-loss-presidents-below-approval.aspx (last accessed 27 September 2012).

‘Presidential approval ratings: Gallup historical statistics and trends’. Accessed at: http://www.gallup.com/poll/116677/presidential-approval-ratings-gallup-historic-trends.aspx (last accessed 27 September 2012).

HSTL, PSF, press conference file, 1945–53, box 53, Truman press and radio conference, 19 Dec. 1950.

FRUS 1952–4, vol. 6, pt 1, McMahon to Truman, 5 Dec. 1951, 695–8.

USNA RG43, Truman–Churchill talks, box 69, ‘Current American sentiment toward Churchill's Britain’, State Department, 17 Dec. 1951.

Colville, Footprints, 233.

HSTL, Records of the American institute of public opinion, 1945–51, box 1, ‘Eisenhower leads list of 10 most admired men in world’, for release 31 Jan. 1951.

HSTL, Records of the American institute of public opinion, 1945–51, box 1, ‘Gen. Eisenhower wins over Truman by big margin in Presidential “trial heat” ’, for release 17 Jan. 1951.

HSTL, Records of the American institute of public opinion, 1945–51, box 1, ‘ “Ike” outpolls Truman by 2–1’, for release 16 Nov. 1951.

Eisenhower, Mrs Ike, 263.

Papers of Dwight David Eisenhower, vol. 12, letter 571.

HSTL, PSF, subject file, 1940–53, memorandum for the Executive Secretary of the National Security Council, ‘Excerpts from a Joint Chiefs of Staff Paper relating to NSC 97/1’, 11 Dec. 1952.

Pedlow, ‘Evolution of NATO's command structure’.

HSTL, PSF, conferences file, 1951, box 143, Pearson, ‘Groups to eye Churchill visit’, Washington Post, 7 Jan. 1952.

House Resolution 514, 82nd Congress, 20 Feb. 1952.

USNA RG43, box 69, negotiating paper, ‘Nature of the US–UK relationship’, 28 Dec. 1951.

USNA RG43, box 68, memorandum by Hamilton, draft position paper, ‘Nature of the US–UK relationship’, 14 Dec. 1951.

USNA RG43, box 68, unattributed memorandum, ‘Principal factors affecting Churchill's position and operating base in the Churchill–Truman talks’, 17 Dec. 1951.

HSTL, PSF, general file, 1945–53, box 99, Fechteler to Truman, ‘Supreme Allied Commander Atlantic’, 2 Jan. 1952.

Acheson, Present, 594.

USNA, RG43, box 69, ‘Current American sentiment toward Churchill's Britain’, State Department special report, 17 Dec. 1951.

USNA RG43, box 69, memorandum by Ridgway Knight, 10 Dec. 1951.

USNA RG43, box 69, minutes Inter-Agency meeting regarding the visit of Prime Minister Churchill, 10 Dec. 1951.

USNA RG43, box 68, ‘Cumulative effect of US papers prepared for Churchill talks’, memorandum by Raynor, 2 Jan. 1952.

ibid. (author's italics).

USNA RG43, box 69, unattributed ‘status report’.

USNA RG43, box 68, Knight to Matthews, ‘JCS comments on papers which the JCS are only considering’, 2 Jan. 1952.

HSTL, PSF, general file, 1940–53, box 100, negotiating paper, ‘The appointment of SACLANT’, 4 Jan. 1952.

ibid.

TNA CAB21/3057, UK record of meeting between US and UK Chiefs of Staff, 6 Jan. 1952.

ibid.

HSTL, PSF, general file, 1940–53, box 99, minutes by David Lloyd of a meeting of the President with the Prime Minister in the Cabinet Room of the White House, 11.00am, 7 Jan. 1952.

HSTL, PSF, general file, 1940–53, box 99, Ridgway Knight's notes of the second formal session, 5.00–7.00pm, 7 Jan. 1952.

ibid.

TNA FO371/97592, communiqué, ‘The question of the Atlantic Command is still under discussion’, 9 Jan. 1952.

Maloney, Securing command of the sea, 133.

HSTL, PSF, general file, 1940–53, box 99, handwritten notations (identified as Truman and Lovett), n.d.

Moran, Churchill, 381.

TNA CAB21/3057, British record of the fifth plenary session, 3.00pm, 18 Jan. 1952.

Public Papers of the Presidents Series, Harry S Truman 1945–53, Joint Statement Following Discussions with Prime Minister Churchill Concerning the Atlantic Command, 18 January 1952, http://www.trumanlibrary.org/publicpapers/index.php?pid=618&st=&st1= (last accessed 27 September 2012).

Moran, Churchill, 377.

This is not to say that the communiqué inured him from criticism in the House of Commons. See, for example, the debates on the navy estimates for 1952–3, and the navy supplementary estimate for 1951–2, Hansard, vol. 497, 6 Mar. 1952, cols 660–777.