995
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Dialogue: Linked Fate and the Politics of Groups and Identities

Effects of belief versus experiential discrimination on race-based linked fate

&
Pages 615-624 | Received 07 Feb 2019, Accepted 28 Jun 2019, Published online: 16 Aug 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Since Michael Dawson first put forward the theory that being targets of racial discrimination increases perceptions of linked fate amongst African Americans, applications of his theory to non-Black and contemporary African Americans have arrived at mixed findings. These inconsistencies may be attributed to different conceptualizations of discrimination and a partiality for personal experiences rather than beliefs about discrimination. Using the 2016 Collaborative Multiracial Post-election Survey, we test the argument both beliefs and experiences with discrimination can affect racial attitudes by comparing how the relationship between beliefs/experiential discrimination and race-based linked fate differs across Black, Latino, Asian, and White Americans. The findings suggest even if non-Whites do not personally experience discrimination, they have beliefs about discrimination towards their racial group, and these beliefs are equally important predictors of their sense of race-based linked fate.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 As shown in , about 10% of respondents replied “don't know.” Findings presented below are robust to dropping these responses.

2 We do however, make an exception for English language interview. A negligible number of Whites and Blacks (1 and 2, respectively) took the interview in a non-English language, so we omitted this variable from the analysis for Whites and Blacks. Although there is obvious ethnic heterogeneity amongst pan-ethnic groups such as Latinos and Asian Americans, we do not control for ethnicity in the primary analysis. In models not reported, most indicator variables for different ethnic groups were not strongly related to the outcome measures. Inclusion or exclusion of them do not change substantive findings reported below.

3 In all models survey weights were applied.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.