https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9972-4425
![Sample our Health and Social Care journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5938/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Health-Social-Care.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Background: Current case definitions for myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) require an individual to report a ‘substantial reduction’ in activity levels, when compared to premorbid functioning. However, little guidance is provided on how to measure these reductions, as well as what level of reduction should be deemed ‘substantial,’ leading to inconsistencies in how this criterion is applied across research settings.
Purpose: The current study examined the influence of substantial reduction criterion on case definitions.
Method: The current study analyzed an international convenience sample of 1002 individuals with ME or CFS, 53 healthy controls, and 260 controls with other chronic illnesses.
Results: Findings indicated that the utility of the substantial reduction criterion varied by case definition, with more stringent case definitions not needing this criterion to identify cases.
Conclusion: These results suggest that the requirement of a substantial reduction in functioning may be redundant when case definitions specify that individuals must endorse a set of core symptoms at specified frequency and severity levels.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Samantha Scartozzi
Samantha Scartozzi was a post-baccalaureate research assistant at the Center for Community Research at DePaul University.
Madison Sunnquist
Madison Sunnquist is a graduate research assistant at the Center for Community Research at DePaul University.
Leonard A. Jason
Leonard A. Jason is the Director of the Center for Community Research and Professor of Psychology at DePaul University.
