https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7678-8426
ABSTRACT
A quadrivalent split-virion inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4; Fluzone® Quadrivalent, Sanofi Pasteur) has been available in the US since 2013 for individuals aged ≥ 6 months. Here, we describe the results of an open-label, multicenter trial (WHO Universal Trial Number U1111-1143–8370) evaluating the immunogenicity and safety of IIV4 in Indian children aged 6–35 months and 3–8 years, adolescents aged 9–17 years, and adults aged ≥ 18 years (n = 100 per group). Post-vaccination hemagglutination inhibition titers for all strains in all age groups were ≥ 8 fold higher than at baseline (range, 8–51). At least 70% of participants in all age groups seroconverted or had a significant increase in titer for each strain. The most common solicited reactions were injection-site pain and tenderness, plus fever in participants 6–23 months and myalgia in older children and adolescents. All injection-site reactions and most systemic reactions were grade 1 or 2 and resolved within 3 days. Only three vaccine-related unsolicited adverse events were reported, all of which were grade 1 or 2 and transient. No immediate adverse events, adverse events leading to study discontinuation, adverse events of special interest, or serious adverse events were reported. This study showed that IIV4 was well tolerated and highly immunogenic in all age groups. This adds important data on the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of influenza vaccines in India.
Every year, influenza accounts for about 5%−10%Citation1,Citation2 of the approximately 43 million episodes of acute respiratory infection in India.Citation3 During the peak rainy season, influenza represents 20%–42% of monthly acute medical illness hospitalizations.Citation1 Since 2017, the government of India has recommended influenza vaccination for healthcare workers likely to be exposed to influenza virus, pregnant women, individuals at increased risk due to chronic illnesses, adults aged ≥ 65 years, and children aged 6 months–8 years.Citation4 However, influenza control is complicated by genetic drift, varying seasonality in the different regions, and poor uptake of influenza vaccines.Citation1
Trivalent influenza vaccines containing two A strains and a single B strain have been available in India since 2004.Citation1 However, during the 1980s, influenza B split into two immunologically distinct lineages, Victoria and Yamagata, which now co-circulate.Citation5 Because B-strain circulation varies between seasons and regions, differences between the vaccine and dominant circulating B lineage are common.Citation6,Citation7 Due to limited cross-lineage protection,Citation8-Citation10 quadrivalent influenza vaccines containing both B lineages are needed to reduce the risk of influenza illness and its associated morbidity and mortality.Citation11 This is especially important in India, where the B strain of influenza appears to be particularly common.Citation12
A quadrivalent split-virion inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4; Fluzone® Quadrivalent, Sanofi Pasteur) has been available in the US since 2013 for individuals aged ≥ 6 months. Phase III clinical trials in adults aged ≥ 18 yearsCitation13,Citation14 and children aged 6 months–8 yearsCitation15 demonstrated that IIV4 was as immunogenic as the comparator trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine for each of the three shared influenza strains and was more immunogenic for the additional B strain. In all clinical trials, IIV4 had a similar safety and reactogenicity profile as the comparator trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (Fluzone®, Sanofi Pasteur).
To meet a request of the Indian health authorities, we performed an open-label, multicenter trial (WHO Universal Trial Number U1111-1143–8370) to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of IIV4 in Indian children, adolescents, and adults. The study was conducted at eight sites between July 2015 and January 2017 and included 100 children aged 6–35 months, 100 children aged 3–8 years, 100 children and adolescents aged 9–17 years, and 100 adults aged ≥ 18 years. This was enough to provide 95% probability of observing adverse events with a true incidence of ≥ 3% in each age group. Participants aged 6–35 months could not have been primed (previously vaccinated with two doses of influenza vaccine approximately 28 days apart), and individuals aged ≥ 9 years could not have been vaccinated against influenza in the previous 9 months. Additional exclusion criteria and are listed in the Supplemental online information.
IIV4 was administered by intramuscular injection. Depending on the age group, participants received one or two vaccinations and either 7.5 or 15 µg of hemagglutinin per strain (see ). Each age group was included and vaccinated separately, starting with the oldest and progressing to the next youngest. Prior to progression to the next youngest group, safety data collected up to 28 days after the first (or only) vaccination were reviewed and approved by the Drug Controller General of India.
Table 1. Study design, vaccines administered, and participant flow.
All adult participants completed the study. Four pediatric participants withdrew from the study for reasons other than an adverse event (). Of the participants who completed the study, more than half were male in the 6–35 month (54.5%) and ≥ 18 year (66.0%) age groups, whereas more than half were female (61.2%) in the 3–8 year age group. For the 9–17 years age group, nearly the same number of males and females were included.
HAI titers were measured from blood collected before vaccination (day 0) and 28 days after the last vaccination, as previously described.Citation16 Pre-vaccination geometric mean hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titers for each strain in each age group were mostly < 100 (1/dilution). Post-vaccination geometric mean HAI titers 28 days after the last vaccine dose (day 28 for children aged 6 months–9 years and day 56 for all others) were mostly > 1000 (). Post-vaccination titers for all strains in all age groups were at least 8 fold higher than at baseline (range, 8–51), and at least 70% of participants in all age groups seroconverted or had a significant increase in HAI titer for each strain (range, 72%–96%). The lowest post-/pre-vaccination titer ratios and seroconversion rates were associated with high baseline titers, especially vs. A(H1N1) and A(H3N2) in participants aged 3–8 and 9–17 years. As found in other studies of inactivated influenza vaccines,Citation16-Citation18 post-vaccination titers decreased with age.
Figure 1. HAI Antibody response to vaccination with quadrivalent split-virion influenza vaccine. Blood was collected before vaccination (day 0) and 28 days after the last vaccination. Serum hemagglutination (HAI) titers were measured as described previouslyCitation16 in all vaccinated subjects with data available and are expressed as 1/dilution. HAI titers under the lower limit of quantitation (10) were assigned a value of 5, and all HAI titers above the upper limit of quantitation (10,240) were assigned a value of 10,240. (A) HAI geometric mean titers (GMTs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined from log10-transformed data using Student’s t-distribution with n−1 degrees of freedom, after which antilog transformations were applied to the results of calculations. (B) Geometric mean ratio of the individual post-/pre-vaccination HAI titer ratio (GMTR). (C) Proportion of participants seroconverting or with a significant increase in titer. Seroconversion was defined as a pre-vaccination HAI titer < 10 and a post-vaccination HAI titer ≥ 1:40. A significant increase was defined as a pre-vaccination HAI titer ≥ 10 and a ≥ 4-fold increase in HAI titer between pre- and post-vaccination. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
As reported by other investigators,Citation13-Citation15 the most common solicited reaction following vaccination with IIV4 was injection-site pain and tenderness, plus fever in participants aged 6–23 months and myalgia in older children and adolescents (). As also observed previously,Citation13 frequencies of solicited reactions decreased with age. All solicited injection-site reactions and most solicited systemic reactions were grade 1 or 2, and most resolved within 3 days. The frequencies of solicited reactions observed here were lower than in other studies of IIV4,Citation13-Citation15 possibly due to lower reporting of reactions by parents in India, as found in other studies.Citation19,Citation20
Table 2. Solicited reactions.
Only three vaccine-related unsolicited adverse events were reported, all of which were grade 1 or 2 and resolved within 2–6 days. These included gastroenteritis in a participant aged 6–23 months, upper respiratory tract infection in a participant aged 3–8 years, and rash in a participant aged 18–64 years. No immediate adverse events (i.e. occurring < 30 min after vaccination), adverse events leading to study discontinuation, or serious adverse events were reported. Also, no adverse events of special interest (Guillain-Barré syndrome, Bell’s palsy, encephalitis/myelitis, optic neuritis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, or febrile seizures) were reported. Thus, there were no new safety signals, and the vaccine appeared to be well tolerated.
Although children and adolescents were well represented, this study enrolled relatively few adults aged ≥ 65 years, which are a key target group for vaccination in India.Citation4 Nonetheless, IIV4 has shown to be well tolerated and immunogenic in this age group in other countries.Citation13,Citation14 In addition, because the study covered more than one influenza season, a further limitation could be that not all participants received the same IIV4 formulation.
In conclusion, this study showed that IIV4 was well tolerated and was highly immunogenic in all age groups despite high baseline antibody levels in some cases and the different seasons and regions. This study adds important data on the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of influenza vaccines in India, which have been lacking, even though influenza vaccines have been in the Indian market since 2004.Citation1 These results should help encourage switching to IIV4 or other quadrivalent vaccines to protect against influenza in India.
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest
J.C. reports receiving a grant from Sanofi Pasteur for conducting the trial. K.S. and V.G.B are employees of Sanofi Pasteur. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supplemental Material
Download ()Acknowledgments
Medical writing was provided by Dr. Phillip Leventhal (4Clinics, Paris, France) and paid for by Sanofi Pasteur. The authors thank Dr. A Ghosh, Institute of Child Health for helping collect data for this study.
Supplementary material
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s website.
Additional information
Funding
References
- Venkatesh M, Doarn CR, Steinhoof M, Ying J. Assessment of burden of seasonal influenza in India and consideration of vaccination policy. Global J Med Public Health. 2016;5:1–10.
- Mathew JL. Influenza vaccination for children in India. Indian Pediatr. 2009;46:304–07.
- Rudan I, Boschi-Pinto C, Biloglav Z, Mulholland K, Campbell H. Epidemiology and etiology of childhood pneumonia. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86:408–16.
- Ministry of Health and Family Welfare DGoHSEMR. Seasonal influenza: Guidelines for vaccination with influenza vaccine. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Health & Family Welfare; 2017 [ accessed 2017 Nov 24]. https://mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/30580390001493710612.pdf.
- Rota PA, Wallis TR, Harmon MW, Rota JS, Kendal AP, Nerome K. Cocirculation of two distinct evolutionary lineages of influenza type B virus since 1983. Virology. 1990;175:59–68.
- Crepey P, de Boer PT, Postma MJ, Pitman R. Retrospective public health impact of a quadrivalent influenza vaccine in the United States. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2015;9(Suppl 1):39–46. doi:10.1111/irv.12318.
- Heikkinen T, Ikonen N, Ziegler T. Impact of influenza B lineage-level mismatch between trivalent seasonal influenza vaccines and circulating viruses, 1999-2012. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:1519–24. doi:10.1093/cid/ciu664.
- DiazGranados CA, Denis M, Plotkin S. Seasonal influenza vaccine efficacy and its determinants in children and non-elderly adults: a systematic review with meta-analyses of controlled trials. Vaccine. 2012;31:49–57. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.10.084.
- Tricco AC, Chit A, Soobiah C, Hallett D, Meier G, Chen MH, Tashkandi M, Bauch CT, Loeb M. Comparing influenza vaccine efficacy against mismatched and matched strains: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2013;11:153. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-153.
- Levandowski RA, Regnery HL, Staton E, Burgess BG, Williams MS, Groothuis JR. Antibody responses to influenza B viruses in immunologically unprimed children. Pediatrics. 1991;88:1031–36.
- Ambrose CS, Levin MJ. The rationale for quadrivalent influenza vaccines. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012;8:81–88. doi:10.4161/hv.8.1.17623.
- Chadha MS, Potdar VA, Saha S, Koul PA, Broor S, Dar L, Chawla-Sarkar M, Biswas D, Gunasekaran P, Abraham AM, et al. Dynamics of influenza seasonality at sub-regional levels in India and implications for vaccination timing. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0124122. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124122.
- Greenberg DP, Robertson CA, Noss MJ, Blatter MM, Biedenbender R, Decker MD. Safety and immunogenicity of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine compared to licensed trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines in adults. Vaccine. 2013;31:770–76. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.074.
- Greenberg DP, Robertson CA, Talbot HK, Decker MD. Safety and immunogenicity of a quadrivalent influenza vaccine in adults 65 y of age and older. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017;13:2058–64. doi:10.1080/21645515.2017.1344375.
- Greenberg DP, Robertson CA, Landolfi VA, Bhaumik A, Senders SD, Decker MD. Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine in children 6 months through 8 years of age. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014;33:630–36. doi:10.1097/INF.0000000000000254.
- Pepin S, Donazzolo Y, Jambrecina A, Salamand C, Saville M. Safety and immunogenicity of aquadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in adults. Vaccine. 2013;31:5572–78. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.08.069.
- Sesay S, Brzostek J, Meyer I, Donazzolo Y, Leroux-Roels G, Rouzier R, Astruc B, Szymanski H, Toursarkissian N, Vandermeulen C, et al. Safety, immunogenicity, and lot-to-lot consistency of a split-virion quadrivalent influenza vaccine in younger and older adults: A phase III randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017;1–13. doi:10.1080/21645515.2017.1384106.
- Cadorna-Carlos JB, Nolan T, Borja-Tabora CF, Santos J, Montalban MC, de Looze FJ, Eizenberg P, Hall S, Dupuy M, Hutagalung Y, et al. Safety, immunogenicity, and lot-to-lot consistency of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in children, adolescents, and adults: A randomized, controlled, phase III trial. Vaccine. 2015;33:2485–92. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.03.065.
- Lalwani S, Chatterjee S, Balasubramanian S, Bavdekar A, Mehta S, Datta S, Povey M, Henry O. Immunogenicity and safety of early vaccination with two doses of a combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine in healthy Indian children from 9 months of age: a phase III, randomised, non-inferiority trial. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e007202. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007202.
- Kompithra RZ, Sarkar R, Mathew LG, Muliyil J, Kang G. Study of common illnesses before and after vaccination: a risk interval approach. Indian Pediatr. 2015;52:933–38.