2,424
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Knowledge and attitudes about influenza vaccination in rheumatic diseases patients

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 1420-1425 | Received 05 Jun 2020, Accepted 24 Aug 2020, Published online: 29 Sep 2020

ABSTRACT

Patients with rheumatic diseases (RD) have a higher risk of morbidity and mortality from vaccine-preventable infections attributed to disease activity, comorbidities, immunosuppressive therapy, and other factors. Vaccines are one of the safest and most effective public health interventions. The aim of this study was to investigate knowledge and attitudes about influenza vaccination as factors influencing vaccine uptake and hesitancy in a population with RD. A descriptive cross-sectional study was designed. A self-administered questionnaire surveyed age, RD diagnosis, ten questions about the uptake, safety and efficacy of influenza vaccine, knowledge of cost-free availability, and the relationship between influenza vaccination and RD. A total of 223 questionnaires were filled; 79.8% of patients were vaccinated for influenza at least once. Uptake by diagnosis was 80.3% in rheumatoid arthritis, 76.2% in osteoarthritis, 86.7% in lupus, 73.9% in other auto-immune diseases (AID), and 60% in other non-AID; 83.9% of patients considered influenza vaccine as safe and effective. From those who had never been vaccinated, 26.7% of patients did not consider influenza vaccine safe and effective vs. 13.5% among patients who had been vaccinated (P = .032). Only 7.6% considered that RD patients could not be vaccinated; 11.7% thought that influenza vaccine would worsen their RD symptoms. This study showed that concerns about safety, efficacy, side effects, fear of the vaccine, and knowledge of cost diminished vaccine uptake. These are factors related to confidence, complacency, and convenience as components of vaccine hesitancy that affect influenza vaccination in RD patients.

Introduction

Patients with rheumatic diseases (RD) have a higher risk of morbidity and mortality from vaccine-preventable infections attributed to disease activity, comorbidities, immunosuppressive therapy, and other factors.Citation1-4 In the general population, approximately 1 in 10 unvaccinated adults were estimated to be annually infected by influenza, being symptomatic in half of these estimates.Citation5 A recent systematic review reported an increased incidence of influenza and other vaccine-preventable infections in patients with RD.Citation4 Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with an increased risk of influenza and its complications (pneumonia, stroke, and myocardial infarction).Citation2 Other RD (particularly psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and spondyloarthropathy)Citation3 treated with biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) have been associated with a higher incidence of influenza-like illness compared with the general population.Citation6 In a cohort of ANCA-associated vasculitis, the combined incidence of influenza and pneumonia was higher compared to the general population.Citation7

Vaccines are one of the safest and most effective public health interventions.Citation8 Influenza vaccination had shown to reduce the incidence, complications, admissions, and mortality from influenza in patients with RD.Citation9 In their 2019 recommendations for vaccinations in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases, the European League Against Rheumatism established that influenza vaccination should be strongly considered for most patients with RD.

Vaccine hesitancy is one of the ten threats to global health established by the World Health Organization (WHO),Citation10 and it is influenced by three main factors: 1) confidence, which is the lack of trust in the vaccine or provider; 2) complacency, which is the perception that there is no value or a need for a vaccine; and 3) convenience, which refers to the perceived lack of access or services toward vaccination. Influenced by these factors, vaccine-hesitant individuals may refuse some vaccines or delay vaccination, some individuals may refuse vaccines altogether.Citation11 Among RD patients who had never been vaccinated, there are more concerns about safety and efficacy that could lead to vaccine hesitancy.Citation12-15

The aim of this study was to investigate the knowledge and attitudes about influenza vaccination as factors to vaccine uptake and hesitancy in a population with Citation18Citation19Citation20Citation21 RD from the north of Mexico.

Patients and methods

Patients and settings

A descriptive cross-sectional study was designed. A self-administered questionnaire was applied during an educational community speech for RD patients in Monterrey, Mexico, in October 2019, where a vaccination module of information was set, and it was also applied in the rheumatology clinic of the University Hospital from the Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon in Monterrey, Mexico, between November 2019 and February 2020. We included all the patients with RD confirmed who approached and accepted to answer the questionnaire in the module from any age, who be able to read and write (regardless of educational level). We excluded in the rheumatology clinic those patients who already filled the questionnaire during the educational community speech.

The study was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice Guidelines, local ethics committee approval was waived due to the descriptive and anonymous nature of the study, permissions from the research coordination and the head of the rheumatology service were obtained. All the participants were informed of the purpose of the survey and verbal consent was obtained before their inclusion.

Questionnaire

The questionnaire asks age (in years), RD diagnosis, and ten questions (modified from Alqahtani et al.Citation16) all with two possible answers (yes/no). Questions ask about uptake of influenza vaccination, safety, efficacy, knowledge of cost-free availability, and the relationship between influenza vaccination and RD. This tool was not previously validated and the modification and translation from English to Spanish were done by the authors.

Statistical methods

Pre-study sample size calculation was not carried out since we performed a descriptive analysis of a convenience sample. Results are presented as frequencies and percentages for categorical variables and according to distribution as means and standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was performed to determine normality. The Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to compare groups: community vs. clinic and been vaccinated vs. never been vaccinated. A P-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were managed in Microsoft Excel and analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA).

Results

General characteristics

A total of 223 questionnaires were filled. One-hundred and twenty-two (54.7%) in the community setting and one-hundred and one (45.3%) in the clinic. There were missing data for age and diagnosis in 27 (22.1%) of 122 patients of the community. The total median age was 51 (IQR = 39–61.75) years. A total of one-hundred and twenty-seven (64.8%) patients had RA, twenty-one (10.7%) patients had osteoarthritis (OA), fifteen (7.7%) had systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), twenty-three (11.7%) had other autoimmune diseases (AID) and ten (5.1%) had other non-AID, . The influenza vaccine uptake by diagnosis was 80.3% in RA, 76.2% in OA, 86.7% in SLE, 73.9% in other AID, and 60% in other non-AID. We also analyzed the characteristics between those who had been vaccinated and those who had never been vaccinated, the results were not statistically significant (supplementary material, Table S1).

Table 1. General characteristics

Knowledge and attitudes

Influenza vaccine uptake and cost awareness

From the total of patients, one-hundred and seventy-eight (79.8%) patients were vaccinated for influenza at least once, ninety-seven (79.5%) from the community patients, and eighty-one (80.2%) from the clinic patients. A total of 208 (93.3%) patients knew that influenza vaccine is freely provided, . Only seven (3.9%) patients who had been previously vaccinated did not know that influenza vaccine is freely provided vs. eight (17.8%) patients who had never been vaccinated (P = .001), .

Table 2. Questions and answers about influenza vaccination in rheumatic patients

Table 3. Previous vaccination, cost awareness, and relationship with rheumatic diseases

Safety and efficacy of influenza vaccine

A total of 187 (83.9%) patients considered influenza vaccine safe and effective. One-hundred and ninety-one (85.7%) patients thought that the best way to avoid complications of influenza is by using the vaccine. Eighty-seven (39.0%) patients answered that it is not safe to be vaccinated for influenza and other vaccines at the same time. Seventy-nine (35.4%) patients thought that influenza vaccine weakens the immune system and makes them susceptible to other infections. Sixty-nine (30.9%) patients considered other products (herbal medications, traditional medicine, or some food) better than influenza vaccine. Fifty-four (24.2%) patients thought that influenza vaccine instead of helping them will get them worse, .

From all the patients, forty-five (20.2%) had never been vaccinated for influenza, in this group, there were more concerns about safety and efficacy. From those who had never been vaccinated, twelve (26.7%) patients did not consider influenza vaccine safe and effective vs. twenty-four (13.5%) patients who had been vaccinated previously (P = .032). Also, eleven (24.4%) patients who had never been vaccinated did not consider influenza vaccine as the best way to avoid complications of influenza vs. twenty-one (11.8%) patients who had been vaccinated (P = .031). There were other differences being not statistically significant that are shown in .

Table 4. Influenza vaccine uptake and safety and efficacy concerns

Influenza vaccination and its relationship with rheumatic diseases

Only 17 (7.6%) patients considered RD patients could not be vaccinated. Twenty-six (11.7%) thought that influenza vaccine would worsen their RD. Differences between each setting are shown in . Among patients who had never been vaccinated were more frequent the thought that influenza vaccine would worsen their RD, nine (20.0%) patients vs. seventeen (9.6%) (P = .051). .

Discussion

Vaccination against preventable illnesses (such as influenza) is recommended for patients with RD by most national and international medical societies.Citation9,Citation17-22 However, vaccine uptake among these patients is low.Citation12-15,Citation23-30

In our study, 79.8% of patients with RD (including AID and other non-AID) were vaccinated for influenza at least once, this is above other studies who had evaluated influenza vaccine uptake at any time in unselected RD population, who reported as low as 0.4% in China,Citation30 28% in France,Citation24 34% in Ireland during the previous 12 months,Citation13 38% among autoimmune inflammatory joint disease patients under biologic therapy also in France,Citation31 and 39.3% in a previous pilot study in our center.Citation28 Taking account only the RA patients, the vaccine uptake persists high in 80.3% compared with other RA populations, who had reported an influenza vaccine uptake in the United Kingdom of 46% of patients with <65 years and 81% of patients with >65 years by Fahy et al.Citation23 57% in the previous 12 months also in the United Kingdom by Bridges et al.Citation12 59.7% in France by Hua et al.Citation14 60.1% in the international COMORA cohort being the lowest in Egypt with 28.7% and the highest in the United States with 89.2% reported by Hmamouchi et al.Citation26 and 65.3% in Germany by Feuchtenberger et al.Citation25

Most of the patients knew that influenza vaccine is freely provided (in Mexico), but among those who had never been vaccinated the proportion of patients who did not know it was higher, to our knowledge only the study by Jiang et al. explore the cost as a factor in RD patients, they report 3% of patients who had never been vaccinated because the vaccine was too expensive.Citation30

We also found in the group of patients who had never been vaccinated for influenza more concerns about its efficacy being part of the factors that affect vaccine hesitancy; 26.7% of patients in this group did not consider influenza vaccine safe and effective, 24.4% of patients of this same group did not consider the vaccine as the best way to avoid complications, it is a high proportion compared to other reports ranging from 5% to 27%.Citation12-14,Citation24,Citation27,Citation30,Citation31 In the same line of efficacy, surprisingly 30.9% of the total patients considered other options (herbal or traditional medicine and some food) better than influenza vaccine, this could be a consequence of tradition and cultural influence of prehispanic medicine in Mexico. Talking about safety concerns, another factor of vaccine hesitancy, we found that 51.1% of patients who had never been vaccinated considered not safe to be vaccinated for influenza with other vaccines at the same time, in this same group 42.2% thought that influenza vaccine weakens the immune system and makes them susceptible to other infections, and 33.3% thought that instead of helping them will get them worse. Other studies also have reported concerns about side effects of influenza vaccine, Bridges et al. reported 19% of concerns over side effects,Citation12 Lanternier et al. reported 35% of fear of side effects among the principal reasons of no vaccination,Citation24 Haroon et al. reported 1.8% of fear of vaccination,Citation13 Hua et al. reported 39.8% (in RA) and 21% (in spondylarthritis) of fear of side effects in unvaccinated patients,Citation14 Brocq et al. reported 40% of concern about adverse effects among not vaccinated patients,Citation27 Harrison et al. reported 35.5% of fear of side effects in patients who declined influenza vaccination,Citation15 Murray et al. reported 25% of fear of side effects.Citation29 All these results should lead us to clarify and educate our patients about the real probability of mild and severe side effects of influenza vaccination.

At last, we also found that 20% of patients who had never been vaccinated for influenza thought that their RD will worsen, this factor has been reported by Harrison et al. at the same proportion 20.1%,Citation15 and to our knowledge this has not been explored in other studies.

Some of our limitations are that we included RD patients in two settings, those who were invited in the community speech, which could results in a selection bias because probably only the patients who are interested in vaccination approach to the module of information, and we also invited consecutive patients who attended to their appointment in our rheumatology clinic. However, there was no difference in the vaccine uptake among these two groups. We also consider the lack of educational level documentation as a limitation in our study as a potential factor that affects knowledge and attitudes toward vaccination. Another limitation is the self-administered nature of the questionnaire and the missing data in age and diagnosis of 22.1% of the patients recruited at the community setting, we neither documented the percentage of acceptance to answer the questionnaire. One more limitation of the questionnaire is the lack of validation, we consider that this could be performed in other studies. We neither do a distinction between the treatments, this could be a factor at the time of vaccination prescription. We included patients from a single center and who attend to a rheumatology clinic, our population could be different from those who attended to primary care or internal medicine clinic.

Among our strengths are that we included AID and non-AID, but it is true that most of our patients have RA. We also evaluated the main components of vaccine hesitancy according to the WHO in our questionnaire. To our knowledge, this is the first study of its kind in our country, which gives us a real-world image of what is happening in the rheumatology clinical practice.

In conclusion, we demonstrated that concerns about safety, efficacy, and side effects are bigger among RD patients who have never been vaccinated than those who accepted vaccination. We also demonstrated that the fear of the vaccine, since it could worsen their RD, and the knowledge of the cost are important factors that diminished the vaccine uptake. All these factors related to confidence, complacency, and convenience are components of vaccine hesitancy that affects influenza vaccination uptake in RD patients. A better understanding of all these factors should lead us to develop multidisciplinary strategies to overtake these obstacles in this population and diminished their infection risk of influenza and all other vaccine-preventable diseases.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Acknowledgments

To Ivan de Jesus Hernandez-Galarza, M.D. to facilitate the running of the study as coordinator of the “Program of Integral Attention in the Rheumatologic Patient”, to the nurses and administrative personal of our clinic.

Additional information

Funding

The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

  • Meroni PL, Zavaglia D, Girmenia C. Vaccinations in adults with rheumatoid arthritis in an era of new disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018;36:317–28.
  • Blumentals WA, Arreglado A, Napalkov P, Toovey S. Rheumatoid arthritis and the incidence of influenza and influenza-related complications: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:158. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-13-158.
  • Sepriano A, Kerschbaumer A, Smolen JS, van der Heijde D, Dougados M, van Vollenhoven R, McInnes IB, Bijlsma JW, Burmester GR, de Wit M, et al. Safety of synthetic and biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216653.
  • Furer V, Rondaan C, Heijstek M, van Assen S, Bijl M, Agmon-Levin N, Breedveld FC, D’Amelio R, Dougados M, Kapetanovic MC, et al. Incidence and prevalence of vaccine preventable infections in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD): a systemic literature review informing the 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for vaccination in adult patients with AIIRD. RMD Open [Internet]; 2019 [accessed 2020 Apr 3]; 5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6803008/.
  • Somes MP, Turner RM, Dwyer LJ, Newall AT. Estimating the annual attack rate of seasonal influenza among unvaccinated individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccine. 2018;36:3199–207. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.063.
  • Bello SL, Serafino L, Bonali C, Terlizzi N, Fanizza C, Anecchino C, Lapaldula G. Incidence of influenza-like illness into a cohort of patients affected by chronic inflammatory rheumatism and treated with biological agents. Reumatismo. 2012;64:299–306. doi:10.4081/reumatismo.2012.299.
  • Mohammad AJ, Segelmark M, Smith R, Englund M, Nilsson J-Å, Westman K, Merkel PA, Jayne DRW. Severe infection in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. J Rheumatol. 2017;44:1468–75. doi:10.3899/jrheum.160909.
  • Ozawa S, Stack ML. Public trust and vaccine acceptance-international perspectives. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013;9:1774–78. doi:10.4161/hv.24961.
  • Furer V, Rondaan C, Heijstek MW, Agmon-Levin N, Assen S, van Bijl M, Breedveld FC, D’Amelio R, Dougados M, Kapetanovic MC, et al. 2019 update of EULAR recommendations for vaccination in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:39–52. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215882.
  • Ten health issues WHO will tackle this year [Internet]. [accessed 2020 Apr 3]. https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019.
  • MacDonald NE. SAGE working group on vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy: definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine. 2015;33:4161–64. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036.
  • Bridges MJ, Coady D, Kelly CA, Hamilton J, Heycock C. Factors influencing uptake of influenza vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:685. doi:10.1136/ard.62.7.685.
  • Haroon M, Adeeb F, Eltahir A, Harney S. The uptake of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination among immunocompromised patients attending rheumatology outpatient clinics. Joint Bone Spine. 2011;78:374–77. doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.10.012.
  • Hua C, Morel J, Ardouin E, Ricard E, Foret J, Mathieu S, Combe B, Lukas C. Reasons for non-vaccination in French rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis patients. Rheumatology. 2015;54:748–50. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keu531.
  • Harrison N, Poeppl W, Miksch M, Machold K, Kiener H, Aletaha D, Smolen JS, Forstner C, Burgmann H, Lagler H. Predictors for influenza vaccine acceptance among patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Vaccine. 2018;36:4875–79. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.06.065.
  • Alqahtani AS, Althobaity HM, Al Aboud D, Abdel-Moneim AS. Knowledge and attitudes of Saudi populations regarding seasonal influenza vaccination. J Infect Public Health. 2017;10:897–900. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2017.03.011.
  • Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL, Akl EA, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, Vaysbrot E, McNaughton C, Osani M, Shmerling RH, et al. 2015 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68:1–26.
  • Rubin LG, Levin MJ, Ljungman P, Davies EG, Avery R, Tomblyn M, Bousvaros A, Dhanireddy S, Sung L, Keyserling H, et al. 2013 IDSA clinical practice guideline for vaccination of the immunocompromised host. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:309–18. doi:10.1093/cid/cit816.
  • Ledingham J, Gullick N, Irving K, Gorodkin R, Aris M, Burke J, Gordon P, Christidis D, Galloway S, Hayes E, et al. BSR and BHPR guideline for the prescription and monitoring of non-biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Rheumatology. 2017;56:2257. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kex389.
  • Cardiel MH, Carrillo S, Pérez M, et al. Update of the Mexican College of Rheumatology Guidelines for the Pharmacological Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis, 2018 [published online ahead of print, 2019 May 15]. Actualización de las guías del tratamiento farmacológico de la artritis reumatoide del Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología 2018 [published online ahead of print, 2019 May 15]. Reumatol Clin. 2019;S1699-258X(19)30079-8. doi:10.1016/j.reuma.2019.04.002
  • Papp KA, Haraoui B, Kumar D, Marshall JK, Bissonnette R, Bitton A, Bressler B, Gooderham M, Ho V, Jamal S, et al. Vaccination guidelines for patients with immune-mediated disorders taking immunosuppressive therapies: executive summary. J Rheumatol. 2019;46:751–54. doi:10.3899/jrheum.180784.
  • Singh JA, Furst DE, Bharat A, Curtis JR, Kavanaugh AF, Kremer JM, Moreland LW, O’Dell J, Winthrop KL, Beukelman T, et al. Update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64:625–39. doi:10.1002/acr.21641.
  • Fahy WA, Farnworth E, Yeldrem KP, Melling GS, Grennan DM. Pneumococcal and influenza vaccination in patients with rheumatic conditions and receiving DMARD therapy. Rheumatology. 2006;45:912–13. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kel104.
  • Lanternier F, Henegar C, Mouthon L, Blanche P, Guillevin L, Launay O. Low influenza-vaccination rate among adults receiving immunosuppressive therapy for systemic inflammatory disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:1047. doi:10.1136/ard.2007.081703.
  • Feuchtenberger M, Kleinert S, Schwab S, Roll P, Scharbatke EC, Ostermeier E, Voll RE, Schäfer A, Tony H-P. Vaccination survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32:1533–39. doi:10.1007/s00296-011-1808-z.
  • Hmamouchi I, Winthrop K, Launay O, Dougados M. Low rate of influenza and pneumococcal vaccine coverage in rheumatoid arthritis: data from the international COMORA cohort. Vaccine. 2015;33:1446–52. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.01.065.
  • Brocq O, Acquacalda E, Berthier F, Albert C, Bolla G, Millasseau E, Destombe C, Azulay J, Asquier C, Florent A, et al. Influenza and pneumococcal vaccine coverage in 584 patients taking biological therapy for chronic inflammatory joint: a retrospective study. Joint Bone Spine. 2016;83:155–59. doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2015.11.005.
  • Carrizales-Luna JP, Galarza-Delgado D, Esquivel-Valerio J, Serna-Peña G, Ramírez-Monterrubio L, Lozano-Plata L, Hernández-Galarza I, Gracia-Arechiga T. AB1248 vaccination rate in patients with rheumatic diseases: a cross-sectional study in mexican patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:1720–1720. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213920.
  • Murray K, O’Rourke A, Low C, Young F, Feeney E, Veale DJ. AB1250 vaccination awareness and uptake in inflammatory arthritis patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:1721–1721.
  • Jiang Y, Zhang X, Lv Q, Qi J, Guo X, Wei Q, Liao Z, Lin Z, Gu J. Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding infection and vaccination in patients with rheumatic diseases in China. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15:1100–05. doi:10.1080/21645515.2019.1568160.
  • Lejri-El Euchi H, Chirpaz E, Foucher A, Sultan-Bichat N, Randrianjohany A, Poubeau P, Gamon E, Roussin C, Osdoit S, Raffray L. Vaccination against influenza and pneumococcal infections in patients with autoimmune disorders under biological therapy: coverage and attitudes in patients and physicians. Eur J Intern Med. 2019;69:25–31. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2019.08.010.