1,409
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Coronavirus – Research Paper

A time-motion study of the COVID-19 vaccination process in an urban primary health center of Odisha, India

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2073759 | Received 10 Feb 2022, Accepted 30 Apr 2022, Published online: 21 Jun 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Vaccination is a critical tool in protecting against COVID-19. It is essential to know the time for each activity in a COVID-19 vaccination process for better management, especially during a pandemic. Thus, we conducted a time-motion study to identify activities that led to delayed/increased waiting time in an urban primary health center in Bhubaneswar, India. We observed 196 COVID-19 vaccine beneficiaries over one month (June 2021) from when they arrived at the vaccination center until they left the center. A data collection form and a Stopwatch were used to estimate the time taken for various activities involved in COVID-19 vaccine delivery. The time taken was expressed in mean and median. We also compared the time taken during the first and second doses using the Mann-Whitney U test. The total mean time spent at the vaccination center was 40:56 ± 20:52 minutes. The activity that took the longest was ‘waiting time in queue before vaccination’, which was 34:22 ± 20:56 min constituting 82% of the total time. The activity that took longer for the second dose than the first was the beneficiary verification in the Co-WIN portal with a median of 27 seconds and 36 seconds, respectively (p < .001). This study will help program managers formulate better strategies to improve the vaccination process making it more efficient.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Author’s contribution

PPG, SHS, and BKB conceptualized the study. AG and AMC have searched the literature. AG and AMC conducted and analyzed the study under the supervision of PPG, SHS, and BKB. AG wrote the manuscript with inputs from SHS, PPG, BKB, and AMC. SHS, PPG, BKB, and AMC reviewed the final manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.