ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has claimed over six million lives and caused significant morbidities globally. The development and use of COVID-19 vaccines is a key strategy in ending this. There is a general public hesitancy on vaccine uptake, including pregnant women who are at high risk of severe forms of the disease and death when infected with the virus. To determine the magnitude of hesitancy toward COVID-19 vaccines and the associated factors among pregnant women attending public antenatal clinics in Dar es Salaam. This was a cross-sectional analytical study conducted among 896 pregnant women attending antenatal clinics at public health facilities in Dar es Salaam. A structured interviewer-based questionnaire, in an electronic form, was used. The analysis was done by a multivariable linear regression model using STATA 16 to obtain factors associated with vaccine hesitancy, and P < .05 was considered significant. The proportion of pregnant women with vaccine hesitancy was 45%. Hesitancy was higher among unemployed pregnant women (AOR 2.16 (95% CI 1.36–3.42) and the self-employed group (AOR 1.62 (95% CI 1.07–2.44). It was also higher among pregnant women with poor attitudes to COVID-19 vaccines (AOR 2.44 (95% CI 1.75–3.39) and women who had low perceived benefits of the vaccines (AOR 2.57 (95% CI 1.83–3.60). COVID-19 vaccine-targeted interventions should aim at the provision of knowledge on COVID-19 and the COVID-19 vaccine and address poor attitudes and perceptions that pregnant women have on these vaccines.
KEYWORDS:
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the AMNE SALIM COVID-19 Research fund for funding the study, MUHAS Research and publication team for their continuous support, the Ministry of Health, President’s Office Regional Administration and Local Government, health facilities administrators for providing permission to conduct research, Regional Health Management Team (RHMT) members for their guidance and support during data collection and lastly we appreciate the support provided by pregnant women who were willing to participate in the study.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Authors’ contributions
Z. H. Y.: Principal investigator, study design, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript preparation (Lead). F. A. A.: Participated in study design, data analysis, and critical review of the manuscript. F. A. and A. A.: Participated in study design and critical review of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author at the reasonable request
Ethical approval and consent to participate
The ethical clearance for the study was obtained from the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Science (MUHAS) research and publication committee with Ref No MUHAS-REC-09-2022–1364. All participants signed a written consent form.
Implication policy
Successful vaccination coverage can be achieved by sharing information on COVID-19 and its vaccine and addressing myths and misinformation about the vaccine. Moreover, there is a need to maintain transparency regarding the efficacy and shortcomings of vaccines to get public trust and confidence in the vaccine.
Abbreviations
ACOG | = | American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists |
ANC | = | Ante-Natal Care |
CDC | = | Centers for Disease Control and prevention |
MNH | = | Muhimbili National Hospital |
MUHAS | = | The Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences |
RCOG | = | Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists |
SAGE | = | Strategic Advisory Group of Expert |
WHO | = | World Health Organization |
Supplemental data
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s website at https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2023.2269777.