928
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Exploring the resilience of local detailed plans in the context of car parking at three study areas in the City of Oulu, Finland

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 274-293 | Received 01 Mar 2022, Accepted 03 Jun 2022, Published online: 15 Jun 2022
 

ABSTRACT

In Finland, based on the Land Use and Building Act, the city has a monopoly in urban planning and design. Through the planning monopoly, the city manages the urban planning process and thus consciously develops the urban structure. Based on the Act, the number of parking spaces stipulated for the property in the local detailed plan and building permit must be provided in connection with the construction work. The obligation of providing a number of parking spaces stipulated in local detailed plans affects the society in many ways. The provision of parking spaces is a key economic factor in construction costs. Car parking is also linked to changes in people’s mobility habits and car ownership. Occupancy rates for obligation parking spaces and other parking spaces vary over time and location. Car parking also impacts urban flood management. Rainwater volumes in condense urban structure can be significant and require heavy technical stormwater management solutions. Urban design is a key action of a city’s competence in terms of preparing for future changes. The number of parking spaces and stormwater management are key tools in urban planning that can be used to define resilience in the northern context of urban planning.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the city of Oulu for the help in data collection for research. This paper is part of the research conducted in the IPaWa project, which is a three-year research project realized between years 2019 and 2022 in the Oulu School of Architecture, University of Oulu. The project is funded by European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the City of Oulu and Oulu-based construction companies Rakennusteho Group and Lapti Group.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the European Regional Development Fund.