2,388
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of moderate to severe Graves’ orbitopathy: a meta-analysis

, , , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 14719-14729 | Received 17 May 2022, Accepted 09 Jul 2022, Published online: 12 Aug 2022
 

ABSTRACT

The role of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the treatment of Graves’ orbitopathy (GO) has attracted much attention. This study is to evaluate the benefit and safety of MMF in moderate-to-severe GO. A meta-analysis of clinical control trials comparing MMF (with or without glucocorticoid (GC)) for the treatment of GO with GC was conducted. We searched the databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), for articles published up to 15 June 2022. The primary outcome is referred to the improvement in overall response, and secondary outcomes included the change in clinical activity score (CAS) and adverse events (AEs). Of the 289 articles initially searched, 6 studies were finally eligible for inclusion. The results showed that MMF (with or without GC) was superior to GC in the treatment of GO (OR 3.34, 95% CI 2.17–5.14; p < 0.00001). Subgroup analyses also showed that MMF monotherapy was more effective than GC (OR 4.46, 95% CI 2.52–7.87; p < 0.00001). Compared to methylprednisolone (MP) monotherapy, a combination of MP and MMF was more effective. CAS decreased even more significantly (WMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.10–0.48; p = 0.002) and fewer AEs occurred (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.06–0.72; p = 0.01) in patients receiving MMF. The pooled data suggested that MMF treatment in GO might be promising. Compared with GC therapy, MMF is safer and more effective. However, more large-sample and high-quality studies targeting MMF use in GO patients and long-term surveillance of prognosis are urgently needed.

Graphical Abstract

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Author’ contributions

Dai Cui and Weijiang Cui were involved in the study concept and design. Wenwen Feng, Yifang Hu, and Chengzhou Zhang were responsible for data collection and analysis. Wenwen Feng, Yifang Hu, Chengzhou Zhang, He Shi, Peng Zhang, Yanli Yang, and Shiying Chen drafted the manuscript.

Data availability statement

All data are provided in this article, and data processing methods can be obtained from corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Statement of Ethics

Ethics approval and consent are not applicable in this study.

Additional information

Funding

The research was supported by Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province [2016-WSN-023], Thyroid Research Program of Young and Middle-aged Physicians from China Health Promotion Foundation, and Foundation of Ili & Jiangsu Joint Institute of Health [yl2020ms02].