291
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical

Comparison of the ability of the King’s and MiToS staging systems to predict disease progression and survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 478-485 | Received 05 Nov 2020, Accepted 08 Mar 2021, Published online: 08 Apr 2021
 

Abstract

Background: Assessing clinical progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) remains a challenge. We evaluated the validity and predictive capabilities of the King’s and Milano-Torino Staging (MiToS) systems in a cohort of patients with ALS to demonstrate their benefit in clinical practice.

Methodology: A cohort study was performed by including ALS incident cases in a referral center from 2007 to 2016. The staging systems were determined at time of diagnosis and follow-up. The standardized median times to reach each stage were computed. A multi-state model in the framework of the Cox model evaluated the predictive value of measurements. The survival C-statistic was reported as a measure of prediction ability.

Results: Overall, 298 incident cases were included. The King’s and MiToS systems described a progressive increase in the risk of dying with each elapsed stage. However, a lower resolution for late disease description for the King’s system was observed, and late stages overlapped for the MiToS system. Slight variations in the staging systems appeared to improve performance based on validity and prediction abilities: (i) in the King’s (C-statistic = 0.783), by adding a new stage involving the need for both gastrostomy and NIV: (ii) in the MiToS (C-statistic = 0.792), by merging stage 3 and stage 4 into a single stage 3.

Conclusion: Both King’s and MiToS are valid systems but have certain limitations. Variations in the staging systems may provide a more suitable framework for describing progression and survival. Further research is needed to evaluate the variations in the staging systems.

Declaration of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the ARSLA: Association pour la Recherche sur la Sclérose Latérale Amyotrophique” for their financial support (AAP ARSLA 2015). This project also received support from EuroNMD.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.