Abstract
Objective: To evaluate how Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) patients’ mortality rates change, based on different levels of forced vital capacity (FVC) and disease duration, providing a scheme of mortality rates of a real population of ALS patients to improve the design of future RCTs. Methods: One random spirometry for each ALS patient was selected during four time intervals from disease onset: (Citation1) ≤12 months; (Citation2) ≤18 months; (Citation3) ≤24 months; (Citation4) ≤36 months. Date of spirometry corresponded to date of trial entry, while time interval onset-spirometry to disease duration at enrollment. Mortality rates from inclusion were computed at different time intervals. Based on progression rates, patients were stratified in slow, intermediate and fast progressors. Survival from recruitment was calculated depending on FVC, disease duration and progression rate. Results: We included 659 patients in group 1, 888 in group 2, 1019 in group 3 and 1102 in group 4. Mortality rates were higher in each group at reducing the FVC cutoff used for recruitment (p < 0.001). Median survival decreased when lowering FVC and disease duration cutoffs (p < 0.001); a higher median disease progression rate of included patients led to lower median survival from recruitment. The proportion of recruited fast progressors raised when shortening disease duration and lowering FVC cutoff. Conclusions: This is a simple model for setting eligibility criteria, based on mortality rates of patients depending on FVC and disease duration, to select the best population for RCTs, tailored to trials’ primary endpoints and duration.
Acknowledgements
Our special thanks also to our colleagues Dr Giuseppe Tabbia, Dr Marco Michele Bardessono, Paola Calvi, Dr Fulvia Ribolla, Dr Luana Focaraccio, Dr Elena Rindone, Dr Michela Bellocchia, Dr Cinzia Ferrero, Dr Ennio Mantellini, Dr Biagio Polla, Dr Lorenzo Appendini, Dr Alessandro Mastinu, Andrea Tagliabue, and Sandro Longu for their valuable collaboration in ALS patients management. The sponsor organizations had no role in data collections and analysis and did not participate to writing and approving the manuscript. The information reported in the manuscript has never been reported elsewhere.
Author contributions
Study concept and design: Maria Claudia Torrieri, Umberto Manera, Gabriele Mora, Letizia Mazzini, Cristina Moglia, Andrea Calvo, Adriano Chiò. Data analysis: Maria Claudia Torrieri and Umberto Manera. Data interpretation: Maria Claudia Torrieri, Umberto Manera, Gabriele Mora, Antonio Canosa, Rosario Vasta, Alessio Mattei, Letizia Mazzini, Cristina Moglia, Andrea Calvo, Adriano Chiò. Acquisition of data: all coauthors. Original draft preparation: Maria Claudia Torrieri and Umberto Manera. Review and editing: Gabriele Mora, Antonio Canosa, Rosario Vasta, Giuseppe Fuda, Paolina Salamone, Maurizio Grassano, Paolo Cugnasco, Nicola Launaro, Fabiola De Marchi, Alessio Mattei, Letizia Mazzini, Cristina Moglia, Andrea Calvo, Adriano Chiò. Supervision: Gabriele Mora, Cristina Moglia, Andrea Calvo, Adriano Chiò. Administrative, technical or material support: Antonio Canosa, Rosario Vasta, Giuseppe Fuda, Paolina Salamone, Maurizio Grassano, Paolo Cugnasco, Fabiola De Marchi, Alessio Mattei, Letizia Mazzini.
Declaration of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.
Data availability statement
Data will be available upon request by interested researchers.