1,499
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Health Services

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) health charities are central to ALS care: perspectives of Canadians affected by ALS

, , , &
Pages 246-255 | Received 09 Feb 2022, Accepted 29 Aug 2022, Published online: 16 Sep 2022
 

Abstract

Objective

Expert consensus guidelines recommend referral of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) to ALS health charities for support. Limited research indicates that patients and families value interaction with these volunteer sector organizations. We investigated how patient support from Canadian ALS health charities (ALS Societies) is experienced by those affected by ALS, and whether patient-centered outcomes validate recommendations for referral.

Methods

Data were drawn from the ALS Talk Project, an asynchronous online focus group study. Patients and family caregivers were recruited from regions across Canada. Seven groups met online for 14 weeks between January and July 2020. Seventy-eight participants made statements about ALS Societies. Data were qualitatively analyzed using directed content analysis and the constant-comparative approach.

Results

Participants viewed ALS Societies as integral to the healthcare system. The Societies acted as patient navigators and filled perceived care gaps, including psychological support. They provided critical practical assistance, particularly equipment loans and peer support groups; comprehensive disease-related and real-life information; and personal connections. They facilitated knowledge of research, emerging therapies, and research opportunities. Delayed referral to ALS Society supports and information resources was a concern for some participants.

Conclusions

ALS Societies provide patients with critical practical, informational, and emotional support and play an overarching role as patient/research navigators. Patient-centred outcomes support patient referral to ALS Societies. Communication about the services provided should be a standard component of clinical care, with choice of access left to individuals. Clinical conversations should be supplemented with information resources developed by these voluntary sector organizations.

Acknowledgements

The authors are sincerely grateful to the study participants who so generously shared their experiences and insights. Thank-you to all who contributed to study recruitment: Drs Hannah Briemberg, Marvin Chum, Angela Genge, Lawrence Korngut, Colleen O’Connell, Christen Shoesmith, and John Turnbull, and their research teams, as well as the ALS Society of Canada and regional ALS Societies, and CNDR. Thank-you also to Emma Camicioli for her contributions to data analysis. Special thanks to the James and Jeanie Brown ALS Research Fund.

Declaration of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (SC) upon reasonable request.