Correction

This article refers to:

Regional economic resilience: towards a system approach

Article title: Regional economic resilience: towards a system approach

Authors: Jesse Sutton and Godwin Arku

Journal: Regional Studies, Regional Science

Bibliometrics: Volume 9, Number 1, pages 497-512

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2022.2092418

When the article was first published online, the following sentences were incorrect.

On p. 498, the penultimate sentence in the first paragraph read as follows:

Additionally, the multi-scalar attributes of resilience and its determinants (e.g., global economic integration) need to be investigated, as well as the micro-level effects of resilient and non-resilient regions, past general labour force statistics and income needs to be explored.

This has now been changed to read:

Additionally, the multi-scalar attributes of resilience and its determinants (e.g., global economic integration) need to be investigated.

On p. 507, the first sentence in the second full paragraph read as follows:

Structural change refers to regions industrial based and the industries that encompass them.

This has now been changed to read:

Structural change refers to regions’ industrial base and the type of industries that encompass them.

On p. 508, first full paragraph, the fifth and sixth sentences read as follows:

The advantage of using the system approach, in combination with performance measures, is that it allows researchers to identify how certain types of resilience influenced or influences their long-term growth and resilience to future shocks. For instance, a region that repeatably employs engineering or ecological resilience to shocks may eventually become locked-in to certain economic activity and reduces its long-run capacity to adapt, which may explain the region’s non-resilient behaviour to future shocks and less favourable long-term growth trajectory.

They have now been changed to read:

The advantage of using the system approach, in combination with performance measures, is that it allows researchers to identify how certain types of resilience influence their long-term growth and resilience to future shocks. For instance, a region that repeatably employs engineering or ecological resilience to shocks may eventually become locked-in to certain economic activity, reducing its long-run capacity to adapt, which may explain the region’s non-resilient behaviour to future shocks and less favourable long-term growth trajectory.

Other minor changes have been made which do not impact the academic content of the article.