194
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

The evaluation of radiologic methods for access guidance in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review of the literature

, , , , , , , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 81-86 | Received 03 Jul 2017, Accepted 15 Oct 2017, Published online: 12 Nov 2017
 

Abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is the treatment of choice for larger and complex renal calculi. First step in performing PNL is to obtain access to the renal cavity using either fluoroscopy or ultrasound (US) guidance or a combination of both. Which guiding method to choose is controversial? A systematic review of the literature was performed comparing image guidance modalities for obtaining access in PNL.

Evidence acquisition and synthesis: A PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane search for peer-reviewed studies was performed using the keywords “ultrasound” AND “fluoroscopy” AND “Percutaneous nephrolithotomy”. Eligible articles were reviewed according to PRISMA criteria. Two hundred and forty records were identified using the keywords. Of these twelve studies were considered relevant.

Results: US guidance seems to be associated with a slightly lower complication rate, which may be related to fewer puncture attempts needed for obtaining access and to better peri-renal organ visualization. On the other hand, US-guidance alone needs the adjunct of fluoroscopy in a significant number of cases for achieving access. Stone free rate (SFR) was comparable between groups. Using US for renal access unequivocally reduces radiation exposure.

Conclusion: Current evidence indicates that both fluoroscopy and US guidance may be successfully used for obtaining percutaneous renal access. Combining the image-guiding modalities – US and fluoroscopy – seems to increase outcome in PNL both with regard to success in achieving access and reducing complications. Furthermore, including US in the access strategy of PNL reduces radiation exposure to surgeon and staff as well as patients.

Disclosure statement

P. J. S. Osther is member of advisory boards of Olympus, Boston Scientific, Bonvisi and Coloplast. P. J. S. Osther has received speaker honoraria from Olympus, Cook Medical, Boston Scientific, Karl Storz Endoskope, and Coloplast.

M. Brehmer has received speaker honoraria from Olympus and Cook Medical.

T. Knoll Company is advisor for Boston Scientific, Olympus; Speaker honorarium Boston Scientific, Cook Medical.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.